WASHINGTON—While China is already boasting “All aboard!” on a network of sleek passenger trains that zip 200 mph and beyond between major urban centers, the United States is still fussing about where to install a single high-speed rail line for a proposed California project.
That’s just a snapshot of how this country continues to lag behind its Asian competitor on the clean technology front.
Can America ever catch up? Yes, says Washington research fellow Miriam Pemberton. But it means taking a $100 billion-dollar bite out of the defense budget annually.
WASHINGTON—When chief executives at electric utilities brief Wall Street investors this winter about the upcoming energy outlook, natural gas and wind will shade out coal by hogging the limelight.
That’s one in a string of predictions for the new year that think tank insider Jonathan Lash offered Thursday during his eighth annual crystal ball session at the National Press Club.
Accompanied by his trusty PowerPoint, the president of the influential World Resources Institute highlighted which energy and environment stories could—or should—dominate global headlines during 2011.
WASHINGTON—Ask environmental advocates for their reaction to the Supreme Court decision to hear arguments in American Electric Power v. Connecticut case and you won’t hear much applause.
Instead, you’ll witness plenty of hand-wringing powerful enough to set flesh afire.
So, what’s all this fretting about?
WASHINGTON—It took a somewhat fancy legal two-step, but Texas has managed to become the sole state to dance around this week’s long-anticipated start-up of the Obama administration’s modest efforts to curb heat-trapping gases.
That makes the Lone Star State the only place nationwide where factories and electricity-generating plants that emit a lot of greenhouse gases can’t apply for the necessary permits to make modifications or begin new construction. Now it’s up to federal judges to figure out how long this peculiar arrangement lasts.
WASHINGTON—Rep. Fred Upton recently suggested that EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson would soon be testifying at oversight hearings so often that she should reserve a personal parking place on Capitol Hill.
With that remark, the Michigan Republican poised to dictate the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s agenda set the tone for how acrimonious the relationship between the 112th Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency might become.
And EPA authorities likely added fuel to an incendiary situation by waiting until Dec. 23—the day after Congress adjourned for the year—to spell out what scientific standards refineries and power plants must meet relatively quickly to limit their prolific carbon emissions.
WASHINGTON— Clearly, the mammoth tax-slicing package that President Obama signed into law Friday has its share of boosters and detractors on Capitol Hill.
Count Sen. Jeff Bingaman among the latter.
Before voting against the $858 billion measure, the New Mexico Democrat criticized his colleagues for allowing the wealthiest Americans to keep more of their money instead of maximizing incentives for energy efficiency.
That squandered opportunity means the chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee will redouble his efforts in the 112th Congress to collaborate with Maine Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe to advance fuel-saving provisions, Bingaman spokesman Bill Wicker told SolveClimate News in an interview.
WASHINGTON—It might have been the inaugural environmental justice forum at the White House. But that doesn’t mean there were a bunch of rookies in the room.
The all-day gathering was barely under way when veteran activists of the movement partially rearranged the Wednesday agenda after they explained emphatically that they wanted federal government officials in the lineup to do more listening and less talking.
Once that was settled, much of the “us vs. them” tension in the room dissipated but didn’t disappear. Advocates from some of America’s most impoverished neighborhoods—where the underbelly of the country’s industrial grind has turned the simple acts of breathing the air or drinking a glass of water into risky and deadly propositions—pleaded passionately and poignantly for substance over symbolism.
WASHINGTON—Environmental organizations will join the EPA in carefully reviewing—and perhaps challenging—a controversial building permit that Kansas authorities granted Thursday to build a 895 megawatt coal-fired power plant in the southwestern part of the state.
Approval of the permit to Sunflower Electric Power Corp. comes just a few weeks before the Environmental Protection Agency’s “tailoring rule” takes effect Jan. 2. That rule is designed to employ the Clean Air Act to control heat-trapping gases from large emitters that are new or undergo significant modifications.
Issuing the permit before that deadline means the new plant can avoid that EPA rule designed to rein in greenhouse gases.
WASHINGTON—Nebraska’s senior senator might now be convinced that the U.S. State Department is adhering to appropriate protocol before deciding on a thumbs up or down for a multi-billion dollar, controversial Canada-to-Texas tar sands oil pipeline.
In a statement issued Friday, Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson said a Dec. 9 letter from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton assured him that "the department won't consider the pipeline permit application until the environmental study is done and the department has taken into account all state and federal views about the proposal."
But the environmental community is far less confident. Green organizations are calling for the Secretary of State to recuse herself from the decision—expected in 2011. Public statements she made in California in October indicate Clinton was already inclined to approve TransCanada's Keystone XL project, and the groups also now claim there's a potential conflict of interest involving a TransCanada lobbyist who previously worked for her presidential campaign.
WASHINGTON—The grassroots side of Charles Komanoff wasn’t exactly dancing in the streets of New York City Nov. 2 when Republicans drop-kicked Democrats from their majority perch in the House of Representatives.
But the number-crunching, energy-policy-geek part of him sniffs an unusual opportunity for his beloved carbon tax to gain traction on Capitol Hill.
“Maybe this is totally wishful thinking, but one possible halcyon effect of Tea Party ascendancy might provide greater latitude for Congress and its ability to tolerate real mavericks instead of phony mavericks,” the 63-year-old founder of the Carbon Tax Center told SolveClimate News in an interview.
Komanoff’s “Exhibit A” is Democratic Rep. John Larson of Connecticut.
The congressman, elected to a seventh term, has written one of several carbon tax bills elbowed aside by what emerged as the bully of the Hill—a failed cap-and-trade measure. When the 112th Congress convenes in January, Larson has vowed to reintroduce “America’s Energy Security Trust Fund,” a proposal he rolled out in 2009.