U.S. Government
International
Academic, Non-Governmental
Greening the global supply chain would help combat climate change and make companies more viable in a carbon-capped world. That's accepted as true by many in big business – except, oddly, by suppliers of major global companies.
It turns out, out of 634 global suppliers surveyed by the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), one-third believe climate dangers pose "no risk" at all to their operations, while just 58 percent see warming as a potential danger to business.
The findings were released this week in a first-of its-kind survey by CDP, Supply Chain Report 2009. The respondents service some of the biggest companies on Earth, including IBM, Johnson & Johnson, Unilever, P&G and Colgate.
Here's why the results are disturbing, via CDP:
Between 40-60% of organisations' total greenhouse gas emissions are recognised as residing outside their direct control and are found within the supply chain through activities such as processing, packaging and transportation.
In other words, it takes an entire supply chain to green a large company. At the moment, that's clearly not happening.
True, corporate giants are starting to green practices within their own walls. In September, CDP reported that 75 percent of the top 500 global companies are now reporting emission reduction targets. More and more, businesses see the risks and opportunities of climate change and are taking mitigation seriously. In many cases, shareholders demand it.
But the fact, CDP says, is:
"Few large businesses have yet developed an effective way of truly addressing climate change impact within their supply chains."
Indeed, the report, written by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, was not just developed to raise supplier awareness of threats but to help companies bring carbon disclosure into their own supply chains. "It is vital that [businesses] lay the groundwork now so they are prepared for future reporting and emissions reduction targets," CDP warned.
It provides them the following guidance:
CDP has been in the carbon disclosure business since 2000, pressing companies to reveal potential risks and liabilities they may be exposed to as the planet warms. It represents 475 pension funds, investment managers and other institutional investors. Last year, it collected data from 1,550 corporations that were reporting emissions.
This week's report sounds a warning about the importance of greening the global supply chain. It should be heeded.
Concerns over climate change are triggering shifts in consumer demand and capital markets. And coming government regulations will force major cutbacks in emissions.
Large companies and suppliers that aren't prepared for these changes will suffer a hit to their bottom-lines when – not if – they occur.
Think global, act local
Supply chains need to be re-evaluated and assess their impact on global warming and climate change.
Poor people are going hungry because climate change is throwing the seasons out of sync and causing crops to fail. It isn't simply a failure of the supply chain.
There is an opportunity for students to get involved and help reduce global warming by adding support to Oxfam's climate change campaign.
Business As Usual
It reminds me of how accountability is lost through layers of Government. The suppliers are not green, but the big company can still claim to be green by using recycled paper for its mail outs, or whatever they claim. Good article. It comes back to the true cost of things as opposed to the price we're charged for them.
Post new comment