U.S. Government
International
Academic, Non-Governmental
In a matter of months, China-based Trina Solar will be able to compete with low-cost industry darling First Solar on cost and price for the first time – courtesy of cheap silicon.
"Next year, our cost reduction roadmap will allow us to compete with First Solar in the balance of system level, so that module wise we will compete with them some time next year," said Terry Wang, Trina's chief financial officer.
That could be causing Arizona-based First Solar to sweat. But solar watchers worldwide should be pleased. It's another sign the industry is starting to recover after a tough 12 months, which saw the sector beaten down by financial recession.
The competitive threat came as part of a surprising record-breaking profit announcement by Trina.
The firm's profits shot up 11 percent in the second quarter from last year, to $18.9 million. It shipped 63.9 MW of solar modules, up 34 percent on the same period in 2008.
The numbers defy the solar industry's recent run of poor financial results. Except for First Solar. Its second-quarter profits were even more impressive, doubling from the previous year to a whopping $180 million.
In fact, the photovoltaics (PV) company has seen a string of achievements as of late. Its Lieberose Solar Farm in Germany has become that nation's biggest solar power plant, and the world's second biggest. It also signed a major deal to build two solar farms in Southern California for utility Southern California Edison this week. The new installations will have a total generation capacity of 550 MW.
That deal takes First Solar over the 1GW mark in its U.S. utility-scale efforts. And it underscores its place as the world's largest manufacturer of solar cells.
That begs the question: Is First Solar's lead really in danger, as Trina Solar suggests?
The answer, it seems, is yes. And the main reason is silicon.
Silicon Price Collapse
First Solar's panels are made not from silicon but cadmium telluride, historically the cheapest of the PV technologies. In the fourth quarter of 2009, the company crossed the coveted buck-a-watt barrier with its proprietary "thin film" panel.
It cost the company just 98 cents a watt to manufacture a module back then. And costs have been dropping ever since.
In 2012, they're expected to plummet to around $0.65 to $0.70 per watt, the company has said.
Trina's silicon-based panels have long had an efficiency advantage over those made from cadmium telluride. And now they're also cheap.
Experts say silicon costs have shrunk 50 percent in the past year alone.
For Trina specifically, the costs of the polysilicon, the industry's key raw material, fell about a third from the first quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of 2009. They plummeted another 30 percent from the first quarter of 2009 to the second quarter. And in the third quarter, costs are expected to fall another 25 percent, and on and on.
By the fourth quarter of 2009, Trina's panels are expected to cost $1.25 per watt to manufacture, a 56 percent reduction over last year.
Trina's not alone. Other Chinese silicon solar players are also narrowing the pricing gap with First Solar, most notably Suntech Power and Yingli Green Energy.
Germany, First Solar's largest market, is expected to suffer the most from this pricing war. UBS analysts have estimated that the solar panels being sold by Asian firms often have price tags that are two-thirds that of those created by German companies, knocking some out of business.
Correction
First Solar broke the $1/watt barrier in the 4th quarter of 2008, not 2009.
:)
German company should know
German company should know better to get their production cost low considering China is now rapidly the leading manufacturer of solar power cells. I know Germany quality is better but if it's me I would still buy panels from China in order to compete the price tags from the grid.
Nowhere does this article
Nowhere does this article state the conditions at the silicon producers that are taking the lumps from rapid price erosion for this main ingredient. And investors should consider whether those costs can realistically plummet like that going forward. Meanwhile First Solar costs continue to decline from quantifiable cost factors derived from lower cost Malaysian plant completions and spread of the lower costs through the sequential quarterly financial statements. Be very careful with the solar biz spin and transitory cost factors.
Post new comment