facebook twitter subscribe

ColumbiaJournalismReview Article

InsideClimate Oil Sands

See Our Stories on Reuters

Donate to SolveClimate News

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

view counter

Why Is National Geographic Still Advertising with Glenn Beck?

Fox News personality Glenn Beck has been on the radar of progressive groups for some time.

In August, the organization Color of Change organized a boycott of his show's advertisers after Beck, known for his incendiary comments, said on Fox News that he believed President Obama was a racist.

Beck has also used inflammatory rhetoric to advocate against the passage of clean energy legislation and to deny climate change, even hosting a 2-hour CNN special in 2007 on global warming, Exposed: The Climate of Fear, that was dominated by climate change doubters and deniers. I asked Karl Frisch, senior fellow with Media Matters for America, a long time Glenn Beck critic, to tell me a little about the history of Beck and environmental issues.

“I hate to use the word history with Glenn Beck because he gets history and science so completely wrong,” said Frisch. “Glenn Beck is one of the leading champions of science denying in the media today. He confuses climate for weather, he misrepresents scientific reports, he routinely hosts climate science deniers and he shows no shame about doing so.

"You have to put that in the proper context of a man that is so consumed with conspiracy theories and malicious style rhetoric that this would be expected. His climate science denial is just an extension of his paranoia that everyone is out to get him and take away his liberty and freedom.”

Still, Beck was mostly just another irritant to the climate activist community — until recently.

This summer, Beck took to the airwaves levying charges of racism and communism against Van Jones, the green jobs advisor with the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Beck also lambasted Jones for signing a petition of the 9/11 Truth Commission. Jones, in addition to being a Yale graduate and a best selling author on the green collar economy, was the co-founder of Color of Change (though he hadn’t been part of the organization since 2007 and was not involved in the recent campaign against Beck) and co-founder of the environmental justice organization Green for All.

After several weeks of attacks by Beck and others, which some think were masterminded by the anti-green jobs group Americans for Prosperity, Jones resigned his White Houses position over Labor Day weekend, bringing environmentalists fully into the fight against Beck and Fox News as his benefactor.

According to Color of Change, since the boycott began, Beck has lost more than 60 advertisers and half the show’s ad revenue along with it, representing $568,000 per week in lost revenue for Fox.

“Companies that have recognizable brands, it’s hard for them not to be accountable at the end of the day to the people who buy their products and services,” says James Rucker, executive director of Color of Change. “Consumers can get advertisers to do what they should do on their own.”

But there remains a list of stalwart supporters that have stuck with Beck. One advertiser in particular is galling to some in the environmental movement: The National Geographic Channel.

Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, the parent company of Fox News, is a 50% owner in the National Geographic Channel, so the affiliation makes sense from that perspective, but the other 50% owner, National Geographic Society, is considered a sacred brand by many in the environmental community. In fact, the organization, founded in 1888, states that one of its missions is “Inspiring people to care about the planet”.

I Don't Feel Beck is a Racist

I have known real racists in my family and being a regular Beck viewer I have never come to believe he is a racist. I live in a town that is nearly fifty percent black and nearly 20% other minority. My neighborhood is mixed and my daughter attends a public school that is about 85% black. At least half of my associates are black. Therefore I am sensitive to racist views and disgusted by them. It is true that Beck doesn't mind going after the administration, but a good political opinion show host should ask the tough questions. If we fail to ask the tough questions of our new black president because he is black, THAT is the racism because we are treating him differently (discriminating) than we would if her were white. The press was extremely tough on Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Nixon, Carter, to mention a few. We can't let President Obama off the hook just because of the color of his skin. He must be judged on his merits and accomplishments, by the people with whom he chooses to surround himself, by how much he lives up to his promises, by how safe we feel under his leadership...these are the things that matter. Beck is asking a question we should all be asking - why do so many people who advise Obama on a daily basis expressed sympathy with socialist, Marxist philosophies and regimes. A man is judged by the company he keeps, organizations he has joined, articles and books he has written, philosophies he has espoused. If we have an administration full of neo-socialist Marxists I want someone to be exposing it. I don't think we can count of MSNBC or CNN to do it.

National Geographic just doesn't care

National Geographic never does any advocacy work. That's because it doesn't care about the environment, animals or people. National Geographic is all about bringing in the big bucks so employees can live the good life. It will advertise on Beck's show because doing so brings in viewers. The more viewers the more National Geographic can get for ad placement.

Informative

I agree with the first poster.I had no idea about National Geographic and the whole environmental issue with Beck. I only knew of him as a racist, not as someone who claims that the climate is fine. Beck's idiocy and inaccuracies get more and more stunning by the hour! I can understand why National Geographic sticks with Fox but it is clear that Fox will eventually either be forced to change the way it presents its "fair and balanced" ( sarcasm) information or it will eventually become defunct. People are now more informed than ever and people will not be denigrated the way Fox, Beck, Hannity, O'Reilly and others such as Limbaugh, are attempting to denigrate them any more. Minorities are rising up and fighting back, as they should. Racism has no place on the airwaves and the general media. These people need to crawl back under their white sheets and hide out in their barns, picking their teeth and basking in their delusional supremacy.National Geographic will either pay a price, or it won't. As of right now, many are still unaware of it's link with Fox. I imagine they're hoping that this link will remain largely unknown or ignored. I doubt it though. I won't be watching National Geographic anymore and I'll let everyone in my inner circle know what's going on. Thanks for the article.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options