facebook twitter subscribe

ColumbiaJournalismReview Article

InsideClimate Oil Sands

See Our Stories on Reuters

Donate to SolveClimate News

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

view counter

Energy-Efficiency Rules for TVs Could Spark an OLED Boom

This week, the California Energy Commission will consider new regulations that would require televisions sold in the state to be 33 percent more energy efficient by 2011 and 49 percent more efficient by 2013.

The move is in response to the proliferation of ever larger and cheaper flat-screen TVs, thanks both to the national switch from analog to digital cable and to the increasing availability of larger, cheaper flat screens that suck huge amounts of energy.

The commission, which will be deciding on the regulations at a Nov. 18 meeting, calculates that televisions and their accessories (DVRs, DVD players, cable boxes) account for about 15 percent of home energy use.

Some manufacturers have backed the proposed rules, but the trade group Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), of which the majority of manufacturers are members, is predictably opposed. The CEA claims the energy efficiency regulations would send TV sales plummeting, costing California $50 million in lost tax revenues and 4,600 lost jobs.

“Consumer electronics manufacturers have already dramatically reduced the amount of energy used by digital televisions — without regulation,” said Gary Shapiro, CEA’s president and CEO. “In less than two years, the energy efficiency of Energy Star TVs has improved by 41 percent. These successful efforts resulted from competition among manufacturers to reduce costs to consumers in the global marketplace — not government mandates.”

Manufacturers of sets built around more efficient displays, however, are likely to see a sales boom.

Of the currently available sets, plasma screens are the most power hungry, consuming .34 watts per square inch, while LCD displays consume .27 watts per square inch, and rear-projection displays consume .13 watts per square inch.

Some of the latest LCD sets, backlit with light-emitting diodes (LEDs), however, are operating far more efficiently, and next generation organic light-emitting diode (OLED) sets blow the rest out of the water.

All the major electronics manufacturers — Sony, Samsung, Philips, LG — have OLED sets either on the market or in prototype form, and it’s expected that by 2012 OLED televisions will be widely available. In addition to requiring less material because they need neither color filters nor backlighting, OLEDs are up to 40 percent more efficient than LCD displays per panel inch.

A diode is a very basic semiconductor, and light-emitting diodes are comprised of negatively and positively charged particles (typically aluminum-gallium-arsenide) that generate an electroluminescent layer (put more simply, light) when they interact with an electrical circuit.

Because LEDs generate their own light, LCD monitors and TV screens that use them as their light source require less energy and can be made much thinner, thus conserving on the materials used to make the set. Although there are televisions on the market that claim to be “LED TVs,” there’s no such thing: They are LCD displays that are backlit by LEDs.

Unlike plasma and OLED displays, where each pixel is its own light source, in LCD displays each pixel has to be illuminated from behind, or backlit. In traditional LCD displays, this is achieved using cold-cathode fluorescent lights that require an external power source.

Energy saving starts in the

Energy saving starts in the home and if everyone gradually switches to more efficient devices the reduction in energy usage will be huge. Efficient TVs is just another step a long the path to having reduced carbon emissions. Lowering the power usage/need of your home also makes the possibility of powering your home through solar and wind much more feasible.

Huge amounts of energy?

From what I've read from the links above, TVs apparently use about two regular light bulbs' worth of electricity. That doesn't sound like a huge amount to me, especially considering the value you get in entertainment. In fact, the more I read about these regulations, the less justification there seems to be for them --at least given the detailed public comments I see. I suggest checking out the public comments posted on the California Energy Commission's website (at the link provided above). The CEA's comments are actually quite interesting. Apparently the regulators have not used valid data and analysis to justify this regulation and are ignoring facts about TV energy use.

why oppose energy efficiency?

Do you sell televisions or manufacture them, Kyle? I can't imagine that anyone else would actually oppose making TVs more energy efficient. Certainly the people paying to power up that entertainment value would be happy if their electricity bills were lower.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options