facebook twitter subscribe

ColumbiaJournalismReview Article

InsideClimate Oil Sands

See Our Stories on Reuters

Donate to SolveClimate News

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

view counter

UN: Next 24 Hours 'Critical' for Global Warming Pact

Security Lockdown Coming as 115 World Leaders Descend on Denmark

Dec 16, 2009

Reporting from Copenhagen

The world's leaders can still forge a global warming pact in Copenhagen but only if major progress is made over the next day, UN climate chief Yvo de Boer said this evening at the UN climate change negotiations.

With two days remaining in the international conference, talks remain deadlocked on all major issues.

"The next 24 hours will be absolutely critical," de Boer said. He said the conference must deliver agreements on "adaptation, mitigation, finance, technology and forests."

De Boer's comments came as climate talks officially moved into the high-level segment. Many of the 115 heads of government joining the conference for its finale will begin arriving at Copenhagen's Bella Center on Thursday, adding security concerns on top of the pressure of cranking out the framework for one of the most complex treaties ever negotiated.


No Money, No Deal

The key sticking point remains financing for climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts, ranging from programs to end deforestation to those that could bring clean energy technology to the developing world.

Without money, developing nations have said, there will be no deal. They're calling for $200 billion per year by 2020, but as of Wednesday night, there were still no firm commitments from wealthy nations to deliver long-term financing.

"Africa is not prepared to accept empty words and agreements that undermine its fundamental interest," said Ethiopian Prime Minister Males Zenawi, speaking for the Africa group of nations.

The only money on the table is a $30 billion package of "fast-start" funds that would run from 2010 to 2012.

On Wednesday, wealthy nations heralded an agreement to pump $3.5 billion into REDD, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation. That money, however, would likely flow from the total pot of kick-start money. It's also just a fraction of the at least $25 billion in seed funding that poorer forest nations say is needed to begin to slow deforestation.

The EU trumpeted its annual $3.5 billion financing contribution to the kick-start money.

Japan announced its contribution to the fund late Wednesday — a $15 billion pledge for developing nations to 2012, of which $11 billion would come from public financing. It will dedicate the funds only if a "successful political accord is achieved" in Copenhagen. The deal must be "fair and effective" and include major developing emitters, such as China, India and Brazil.

The United States hasn't put any concrete figures on the table.

U.S. Sen. John Kerry, who landed in Copenhagen today for a whirlwind 24 hours of negotiating, said it is essential "to talk" long-term finance, but "the most important thing" is securing a short-term deal.

José Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission said: "The EU has made an important contribution for financing. We need an American partner and a Chinese partner."


Emissions Targets and Bracketed Text

The scale of CO2 emissions-reduction targets by rich nations is creeping toward 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2020, far more ambitious than the United States' proposal, but well below what scientists say is necessary to slow climate change. The G77 plus China are calling for an aggregate target of 40 percent from 1990 by 2020.

The U.S. is adamant about a strong review and verification system that would tie financing in poor nations to their national carbon-fighting goals. For its part, the developing world wants to ensure that a strong legal deal is in place before the Kyoto Protocol gets dumped for a broader pact that covers the United States.

Neither of these has yet to be agreed upon.

The Danish government released another draft text, which China said would kill Kyoto and strongly favor the rich. In the end, and after much debate, the basic document emerged full of bracketed text, meaning most, if not all, of the major issues will likely be sent up to the heads of government for resolution in the last hours of talks.

A deal could happen in the "last minutes," Barroso said.

If a root cause of the

If a root cause of the global threats on humanity's horizon now is the unbridled growth of absolute global human population numbers, our willful denial of this primary cause could make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the children to reasonably address and sensibly overcome these threats. Then the children are likely being directed down a "primrose path" to confront some unimaginable kind of ecological wreckage, the likes of which only Ozymandias has seen.

What about ecological effects of increasing human pop. numbers?

Nobody spoke the "P" word in Copenhagen............

People are not speaking out loudly and clearly about the colossal threat that is posed to humanity by the skyrocketing growth of human population numbers on Earth.

Despite the unfortunate, inhumane ways a "ONE CHILD PER FAMILY" policy was implemented in China, the policy could be vital for the future of humankind and life as we know it in our planetary home. The immediate, free, universal and compassionate implementation of a voluntary "one child per family" policy could decisively limit adverse, human-driven impacts on Earth's body and its environs, and do so more powerfully than any other conceivable human intervention.

Given the already visible, converging global threats to human wellbeing and environmental health that are presented to the family of humanity in our time, the humane implementation of one child per family could be an indispensible centerpiece of a set of adequately designed, actionable programs that serve to actually rescue a good enough future for the children and coming generations.

If a root cause of the global threats on humanity's horizon now is the unbridled growth of absolute global human population numbers, our willful denial of this primary cause could make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the children to reasonably address and sensibly overcome these threats. Then the children are likely being directed down a "primrose path" to confront some unimaginable kind of ecological wreckage, the likes of which only Ozymandias has seen. The children will not understand why the catastrophe is occurring. Because their elders refused to acknowledge the best available scientific evidence of human population dynamics and, therewith, adequately "diagnose" the distinctly human-induced global predicament all of us face now, the children will not know what hit them, why it is happening, and what is required of them so as not to commit the same mistakes made by the elders.

This is only a guess but please note the likelihood that history will not be kind to the leadership provided by my not-so-great generation of arrogant, extremely foolish and avaricious elders.

C'est fini

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options