facebook twitter subscribe

Donate to SolveClimate News

Visualizing CO2: Making Emissions Tangible to Change Behavior

Carbon Budgets, Landmarks Help People Wrap Their Minds Around Emissions

Apr 30, 2010

Despite increased awareness about carbon emissions and the ability to quantify it, there is still a gap between pledges of a low-carbon lifestyle and true behavioral change.

The reason, say carbon consultants, psychologists and policy analysts, is that carbon emissions aren't tangible. People can’t see the CO2 emissions from their cars and homes and airplane travel, and most can’t visualize their impact.

Companies and ecopreneurs alike are now testing strategies to change that, from introducing personal carbon budgets to making carbon into relational metrics like calorie counts and spatial objects.

National governments have handled carbon tangibility to some extent through tariffs and taxes. There is also episodic evidence of effective behavioral change when energy companies provide real-time feedback, such as sending electric bills that compare neighbor to neighbor in energy use. According to an American Psychological Association study, this can lead to energy savings of 5-12% for six months or more.

“This kind of information is believed to be more effective because it is specific to the individual’s situation and is conducive for learning how to achieve the savings,” the APA says.

A separate study about changing transportation behaviors by the Department for Transport (UK), however, found that the participants' stated intentions to change were not reflected in actual behavior.

It will be challenging to close that attitude-behavior gap, the APA warns, because “many of the most GHG-intensive consumer behaviors ... may be strongly affected by contextual factors.”


Putting CO2 in Context

Carbon Sense, a sustainability consulting firm based in the UK, is attempting to contextualize carbon by creating spatial relationships between the volume of carbon and familiar objects.

“We’re saying ... to people, there’s this huge problem. ... We’re used to giving this as the metric, which might make sense to engineers or scientists, but it doesn’t actually make sense to many people at a deep level," explains Antony Turner, one of the founders of Carbon Sense.

To put the numbers into context, Turner takes, for example, the amount of CO2 that comes out of car exhaust every 6 km and shapes it into a balloon with a 1 meter diameter, like the balloon the girl is holding in the photo above.

“People say ‘Ah, ha!’” he said. “It tips it into the space of our mind that says this is real rather than the space in our mind that says, ‘look at tomorrow.’ “

Based on different metrics, say the amount of CO2 emitted by a government building or a school, Carbon Sense creates graphic volumes and then places those next to familiar cultural monuments, such as Westminster. The illustration at right, for example, shows London's daily CO2 emissions in relation to its landmarks.

Turner’s newest spatial conception is the Carbon Quilt. Every day, according to Turner and his colleague Adam Niemen, a physicist, humans “gift-wrap” the planet in enough CO2 that it could form a layer roughly equivalent to the thickness of a piece of paper, 86.9 microns. Over one year, that’s 31 millimeters (roughly, 1 inch) thick — visualize a quilt covering the planet, growing thicker each year and trapping more heat, they say.

The tool at carbonquilt.org allows people to see a physical layer of CO2 emitted by a country, city, energy source, over a period of time placed over a map of a geographic area.

Comments

Very interesting

This is very interesting indeed. CO2 is a very abstract subject, so I can understand that many people have problems to visualise how much they emit/can save.

I must say that I find the first picture, the one with the balloon very illustrative. I work with environmental issues, and when I present an amount of CO2 to "ordinary" people in metrics, they get a blank look in their eyes. It would be so much better to simply present it in a figure like that.

The shoe size analogy was also very interesting. It is easy to relate to and simple enough to present to anybody. And why not use it if we are talking about footprints anyway.

The carbon budget scheme in itself is quite intriguing. It create an incitement for change, adding in the possibility to gain money as well as involving their families. Is the commute a part of the calculation? I am currently an intern at Commute Greener! (www.commutegreener.com) and we are working on reducing the carbon footprint from commuting. As such, I find the carbon budget very interesting since it is a bit like our own consent.

I will continue to follow this site. I love articles like this.
best regards
Fredrik

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options