U.S. Government
International
Academic, Non-Governmental
WASHINGTON— Interior Secretary Ken Salazar yesterday took a bold step to reform the department's cozy relationship with the oil and gas industry, proposing to divide the Minerals Management Service (MMS) into three separate parts, and abolish its name. (See Addendum below, for details.)
The move may still not be enough to satisfy environmentalists, who were encouraged by initial reform efforts but at the time still wary, unconvinced that the Interior Department could really clean up its own house.
Splitting up the conflicting duties of MMS is imperative, environmentalists say. But positioning the safety and environmental office in the Department of Interior is the equivalent of hiring a fox to guard the henhouse.
In an ideal world, environmental advocates emphasize, MMS’s safety and environmental division would be moved from Interior to another appropriate agency.
Likely candidates include the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the U.S. Coast Guard or the Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
“Interior has fundamentally been unable to manage MMS,” Erich Pica, president of the advocacy organization Friends of the Earth, told SolveClimate in a Wednesday interview. “MMS has an inordinate amount of responsibility. When they fail, they can destroy whole communities.”
Salazar might talk about change, Pica continued, but he likely won’t go far enough in taming an agency that has collected an average of $13 billion for the U.S. Treasury annually. About half of its $342 million budget for 2010 comes in fees and rental receipts from the energy industry.
“(MMS) has been a failure for at least 20 years,” Pica said. “We can’t rely on the Department of the Interior to reform itself.”
Sen. Barbara Boxer, the California Democrat who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, also has spoken out in favor of the idea of moving the safety and environmental function of MMS out of Interior's control.
Structure with More Integrity
Turning a division over to a different department or agency is difficult and politically challenging because politically adept cabinet members, always mindful of their legacy, are reluctant to dismantle their own authority.
Peter Van Tuyn, a longtime environmental attorney based in Anchorage, Alaska who counsels advocacy organizations, maintains that splitting MMS’s duties and moving the oversight duties out of Interior would provide a structure with more integrity.
“We need a secretary who has enough humility to recognize that he can make a stronger, not weaker, department by doing so,” Van Tuyn said in a Wednesday interview. "I have a lot of respect for Salazar. He needs to make some tough decisions.”
Salazar has vowed to reform MMS since he became Interior secretary in early 2009. His first order of business was cleaning up a division of 1,700 employees beset by a sex, drugs and illegal gifts scandal that erupted before Obama took office.
The former senator of Colorado has been in a harsher spotlight since a blowout preventer on the Deepwater Horizon rig failed April 20, leading to the BP spill that is dumping an estimated 5,000 to 25,000 barrels of oil and natural gas into the Gulf of Mexico daily. Almost one-third of this nation’s domestic oil production comes from the gulf.
MMS has been accused of being lax with safety requirements and remiss on heeding advice from scientists and engineers. Just last week, President Obama called for reform after noting the “cozy relationship” between MMS and the oil and gas industry.
Senators Blunt about "Safety Swamp" at MMS
A cool and collected Salazar, who testified at two different congressional hearings thus far this week, was flanked by Liz Birnbaum, the director of MMS, and deputy secretary David Hayes when he answered questions before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources for 2½ hours Tuesday. Hayes, Salazar said, took the lead role in the recent reorganization of MMS.
Gilf oil spill
Where are the giant oil tankers, floating storage bins and dredgers and super suckers to vacuum the oil?
Why isnt there a wall or fence containing the oil to a certain area while vacuuming it up?
"You really don't need a nuke to handle it, you are trying to seal the pipe, big explosions are used to snuff burning wells so you can cap them.
The ocean holds approx 326,000,000,000,000,000,000 gallons of water.
The one quart is an extrapolation of some real data.
Which says under ideal conditions, a quart of oil may pollute up to 150,000 gallons. We had bigger spills during the gulf war then this, and due to the war clean up and dispersal efforts where not done for a long time. And the Gulf, survived, (we survived)
But if we use the 250,000 number we still have 97023809 days before the ocean is polluted, but then again the well will run out of oil way before then. And that is assuming the oil does not blow ashore which it is, it assumes that the oil does not bond and sink which much is, it assumes some does not evaporate which yes oil does, it assumed they don't use bonging agents to sink the oil, it assumes they don't use chemicals to disperse and break up the oil.
Simply put we have a long long long long long time before it will impact us to an extent other then making a few people rich, and a lot of us poorer as the fear factor drives food and fuel prices up.
But that aside the well is not 30,000 feet deep it did drill that deep of a well in the tiber field in 2009, this well was not very deep yet. It did not land on top of the well. Oddly enough when a floating vessel sinks it does not go straight down, current carry it and move it as it sinks, it is resting on the ocean floor about 1/4 mile away from the well.
All that said currently remote subs are placing a liner inside the existing pipe to seal it and pipe the crude to the surface.
Really they don't want to seal the pipe itself, as that is a huge loss as in the cost of the drilling, and then loss of the oil. I don't agree with that, the well could have been sealed on day one, if they wanted to, but they want the oil.
The internet is full of fun news sites, most of them run by people with hidden agenda's and motives, many who are just interested in having fun...
You always need to temper what you read with common sense. Verify what you read by cross referencing the references and checking the resources. Often the easiest give away is the English and grammar.
Wheres our tax payer dollars going ?
This is not hurting us but its hurting you and your families for possibly generations
There are 50 empty British tankers siting in port
They each hold millions of gallons
How about building recycling plants in the ocean or on the shore or mobile recyclers on tankers?
Post new comment