facebook twitter subscribe

ColumbiaJournalismReview Article

InsideClimate Oil Sands

See Our Stories on Reuters

Donate to SolveClimate News

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

view counter

Skeptics Failing to Get Anti-Climate Science Agenda into Texas Classrooms

Teachers are largely ignoring a Board of Ed demand to spread doubt about man-made global warming, a SolveClimate investigation finds

Jun 1, 2010

Last March, the Texas State Board of Education approved controversial language in the curriculum requiring teachers to cast doubt on human contributions to climate change. Now, more than one year later, it appears that rule is being largely ignored by educators across the state, a SolveClimate examination has found. 

In fact, dozens of inquiries failed to turn up one science teacher in Texas whose approach to the subject of climate change has been at all affected by the amendment to the state science curriculum. The standard has also done nothing to turn students against the consensus view of man-made global warming, according to educators.

Some even said that their students are more receptive than ever to the established science. 

"It's too 'in the news' for it to go away," said Paul Caggiano, an environmental science teacher at St. Pius X High School in Houston. "When I ask a kid to do a current events report, they're not going to come up with a skeptical view of climate change. They're going to see it for what it is."

Still, as the scientific consensus continues to build worldwide, skeptics of global warming show no sign of giving up their fight against teaching the mainstream view in classrooms in Texas, and across the United States.

 

Skeptic-Led Efforts  Aim for 'Objective Review' of Science

On May 25, the Mesa County School Board in Colorado received a 700-signature petition from a local lawyer and conservative activist demanding that climate change no longer be taught as scientific fact in Mesa County schools.

Similarly, in March, the South Dakota State Legislature passed a bill urging teachers to make clear to their students that "global warming is a scientific theory rather than a proven fact." And earlier this year, the Kentucky Science Education and Intellectual Freedom Act was submitted to the state legislature in an effort to encourage debate over "the advantages and disadvantages" of scientific theories being studied.

Though the Kentucky bill died in committee, it was modeled after a similar bill, which became Louisiana state law in 2008, and encouraged teachers "to help students understand, analyze, critique, and objectively review scientific theories," such as climate change.

If these laws sound somewhat redundant — promoting lessons and teaching techniques that most educators already use — it's because they are.

Beyond merely encouraging additional "analysis" and "objective review," of course, they're intended to get teachers to devote more class time to arguments against the existence of anthropogenic, or man-made, climate change. So was the case in Texas.

 

New Climate Language 'Unnecessary,' 'All Politics,' Teachers Say

In March 2009, the Texas State Board of Education changed the language in the state curriculum to force teachers to analyze and evaluate "different views on the existence of climate change."

Even in that notoriously conservative state, however, the effort appears to be failing. 

Jamie Biel, an environmental science teacher at Lake Travis High School in Austin, for instance, said the amendment was "unnecessary."

Where does lack of respect for science come from?

So far, the only group of people in the world to display grotesque arrogance and lack of respect for scientific organizations are the Young-Earth Creationists. YEC’s believe the earth is only 6000 years old when in fact about 40 different lines of scientific evidence all corroborate each other and prove that it’s closer to 4.5 billion years old. As far as the science goes, these people are off by a factor of 750,000 to 1. It’s like asking someone how far they think the moon is from the earth and they tell you it’s 3 miles away.

By the way, they will also argue until the cows come home that the science backs them up.

The Republican party is inundated with Young-Earth-Creationists who abhor science. Many of them think we should let the earth fall into ruin because then Jesus will come back. Many of them also believe that rules to protect the environment aren’t just wrong, but, evil.

Today’s campaigners against action on climate change are for the most part backed by the same lobbies, individuals, and organizations that sided with the tobacco industry to discredit the science linking smoking and lung cancer.

Later, they fought the scientific evidence that sulphur oxides from coal-fired power plants were causing “acid rain.”

Then, when it was discovered that certain chemicals called chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were causing the depletion of ozone in the atmosphere, the same groups launched a campaign to discredit that science, too.

Later still, the same groups defended the tobacco giants against charges that second-hand smoke causes cancer and other diseases.

And then, starting mainly in the 1980s, this same groups took on the battle against climate change.

In each case the same groups accused scientists of being involved in a scientific conspiracy to drum up “business.” The same groups used identical tactics to fight controls on tobacco, acid rain, ozone depletion, second-hand smoke, and other dangerous pollutants.

Read: Why Wouldn’t You Trust Climate Scientists?

http://harryhammer.wordpress.com/2010/03/15/why-wouldnt-you-trust-climat...

WMD's of Climate Change

What sickens me and makes me so disillusioned about humanity, is how flippantly, casually and thoughtlessly these climate changers condemn our children to a death by CO2. We couldn’t jail Bush for his crimes but this enviro-Iraq war will be dealt with by history.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options