facebook twitter subscribe

Donate to SolveClimate News

InsideClimate Oil Sands

ColumbiaJournalismReview Article

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

See Our Stories on Reuters

view counter

Rep. Inslee Proposes Shared Fee on Electric Bills for Clean Energy

Bill introduced in Congress is modeled on Germany's success in using feed-in-tariffs to power a clean energy boom

Jul 29, 2010

WASHINGTON—When you’re peddling an esoteric idea with a cumbersome name on Capitol Hill, you expect to draw a fair share of glazed-over looks from senators and representatives.

Renewable energy advocate Craig Lewis is all too familiar with that particular gaze.

“Two years ago, and even today, most legislators give you a blank stare when you mention feed-in tariffs,” Lewis, executive director of the FIT (Feed-in Tariff) Coalition told SolveClimate News in a Wednesday interview. “I figure we’re at 25 percent penetration right now. But we need to be at 80 percent before we can push this bill up the Hill and roll it down the other side.”

The 18-month-old Palo Alto, Calif.-based nonprofit is behind Rep. Jay Inslee’s revamped legislative effort to encourage a mammoth boost in solar and wind power by offering financial incentives to consumers and businesses nationwide who generate electricity via renewable sources.

Inslee’s legislation, introduced late Tuesday night, is called the Renewable Energy Jobs and Security Act. It’s a tweaked version of a bill that went nowhere after the Washington Democrat first introduced it in 2008.

In a nutshell, Inslee’s bill is based on Germany’s feed-in tariff, an enormously successful program that many consider the gold standard worldwide. Producers of clean energy a connection to the nation’s electric grid and predetermined rates from utilities for the power they generate.

The extra cost of the clean power shows up on every citizen's electric bill as a small increment. Everyone pays in common to support the transition to clean energy. 

“Germany is a model for the United States,” Randy Hayes, U.S. director of the nonprofit World Future Council, explained during a Wednesday briefing organized by the FIT Coalition. “It’s a race to catch up. We need to shift from being a nation of energy consumers to a nation of energy producers.”

Fiscal hawks need to be aware that feed-in tariffs are not another bloated government program intended to bankrupt ratepayers, supporters say. Instead, under Inslee's plan a government entity offers a premium price to clean energy generators such as homeowners, schools and industries as an incentive to outcompete dirtier and cheaper coal, oil and natural gas.

The extra cost of clean power is reflected as a line item in each ratepayer’s electric bill—referred to as a shared fee for the common good. Theoretically, the price for clean energy will fall as it displaces fossil fuel.

Timing on the bill is less than perfect because Inslee launched it the day before Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., opted to leave a national renewable energy standard out of an extremely pared down energy/climate bill that senators plan to tackle before exiting Washington for their August recess at the end of next week. A feed-in tariff is a pricing mechanism designed to work in tandem with—not replace—a renewable energy standard at the national level or a renewable portfolio standard at the state level.

Feed-in Tariffs Blooming Worldwide

Price guarantees for feeding renewable power into the grid are catching on in dozens of countries worldwide where at least five different types of models seem to be thriving. For example, Vermont and California are among handfuls of states taking a close look at feed-in tariffs, and cities with municipally owned electric utilities such as Indianapolis, Sacramento, San Antonio, Texas, and Gainesville, Fla., are also putting them into place.

Germany initiated its feed-in tariffs back in the early 1990s, using U.S. laws as a model for fashioning its nascent legislation. After reinventing its model in 2000, it has parlayed the price guarantees into an economy where more than 14 percent of Germany's electricity comes from green sources. The plan calls for bumping that number up to 33 percent by 2020.

Payments made to generators of clean energy in Germany have fallen considerably, according to news reports. For instance, The overwhelming success with solar prompted Chancellor Angela Merkel to slice the price paid for power from roof-mounted solar panels by 16 percent in early June.

The previous comment misses the point

Solar energy even at the higher feed-in tariff prize is a steal !!!

Here is why: It is produced at peak time !!! Get it ???

If you simply take this fact into account, then this energy is very cheap,
even in Germany where there is not much sun

Yes the prize is higher than energy produced in the middle of the night.
But that energy is useless. During the night we have too much energy anyway.
Comparing the solar energy price to the night price
is a standard way to mislead the public

BTW - Germany has been selling peak time solar energy to France this Summer.
This is because the French nuclear power plants could not run at full
capacity this summer (the rivers were too hot). Also the heavily government supported
nuclear industry simply produces a constant amount of energy all day long.
Not like solar, which by a fluke fact of nature is available when its needed

Just was in Germany this summer. There is a green energy producing euphoria there
(similar to Scandinavia). This is particularly noticeable in the country side. Homeowners and farmers are driving the revolution. It is pretty miraculous.

And all because of a smart law. The energy companies in Germany are fighting back
though:
- They managed to get Government support of large scale project in the north sea
instead of the decentralized energy production fostered by the feed-in laws
- Also large solar establishments can now be shut off if too much energy is available

The US needs to empower its people and catch up with Scandinavia, Germany and China

kudos to Inslee!

If Jay were here I'd give him a big hug!

This is the kind of legislation we need. The Solar Gardens Institute gives its whole-hearted support.

Balance this article please.

Balance this article please. Your readers would have benefited from some balance. Utilities are "less than enamored" of feed-in tariffs because of costs, not because of a need for control (although the variable output of renewables does considerably complicate the grid operator's ability to balance the system). Germany's feed-in tariff guarantees the energy producer the equivalant of 65 cents per kilowatt-hour (or more depending on the exchange rate). That's six to ten times the typical cost of retail power, depending on where you live. With uneconomic subsidies that impose costs on consumers, you can be the world leader in solar. If you really want an effective response to climate change, give the subsidy to nuclear power. Then, at least, your carbon-free generation source will produce at night.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options