facebook twitter subscribe

Donate to SolveClimate News

Unlike Calif., Australia Has No Choice But to Desalinate Their Sea Water

The main difference for Australia is that they 'truly ran out of water'

Dec 17, 2010

Editor's Note: This is the last in a three-part series on the development of seawater desalination plants in California and other drought-prone regions, looking at the environmental and economic challenges involved.

When California regulators this month approved a facility on the state's central coast that would turn salty ocean water into drinking water, it was in the face of environmental concerns and warnings that the project's hefty price tag could drastically hike customers' water bills.

The $400 million public-private facility is expected to deliver 10 million gallons of water per day to residents of the Monterey Peninsula by the end of 2015. Project detractors say the plant is too energy hungry, and that it could increase water prices by up to four times their current rates.

But in the face of state-mandated cutbacks in water withdrawals from the nearby Carmel River, the utility and water agencies behind the project say they have nowhere else to turn.

In that sense, the Monterey project, one of more than a dozen proposed desalination plants on the U.S. West Coast, mirrors a situation on the other side of the world.

Australia 'Ran Out of Water'

In Australia, desalination plants developed in response to severe and protracted drought. They could supply about one-third of the country's water in the next two years, according to estimates.

"The main difference for Australia is that they truly ran out of water," said Paul Choules, vice president for desalination and reuse for Veolia Water Solutions and Technologies, one of the world's biggest desalination companies. "They had to move and they had to move quickly."

Since the 1970s, southwest Australia has seen declines of up to 20 percent in its annual rainfall. In the past decade, a drought said to be the worst in more than 100 years parched much of the country and forced state and local agencies to look to alternate water sources.

Through analysis of increased snowfall in Antarctica, scientists have pegged climate change as a cause of the extreme weather, and predict that water shortages will only intensify in the future for what is already the driest inhabited continent.

"Certainly the need has been identified there with climate change," said Lisa Henthorne, director of the International Desalination Association, a Topsfield, Mass.-based nonprofit group. "Demand and lack of alternatives is pushing [desalination]."

In southeast Australia, for example, droughts are projected to increase up to 40 percent by 2070.

"The effect of climate change on the hydrological cycle, and the consequences for water resources, is one of the most important aspects of climate change for societies around the world, and particularly for Australia," according to a 2009 report from the Australian Government’s Department of Climate Change.

Global 'Water Bankruptcy'

Australia's water pains may presage what's to come in other regions as the world teeters on the verge of what the World Economic Forum has called "water bankruptcy."

By 2025, 1.8 billion people around the world will be living in water-scarce regions, while two-thirds of the world's population could be under stressed water conditions, according to the UN figures.

Australia isn't the only country to tap into the ocean to augment water supplies. Worldwide, more than 15,000 desalination plants in about 150 countries produce about 65 million cubic meters of fresh water each day, according to the International Desalination Association, which defines desalination as any process that involves removing dissolved solids from water.

Comments

Desalination

Just like Australia there are many countries like Israel who are running out of clean water. Desalination is one solution but unless we do something to stop global warming clean water will be soon a problem for many...

Desalination

The quote 'they truly ran out of water' is pure industry hype.

Southern Australia has (until the recent deluges) certainly had a crisis and has a long-term problem, but we have always had an erratic climate.  A few places did nearly run out, but the rest of us coped.  We need to do much more, but there is much we can do without resorting to desal, which is highly energy intensive and expensive and cannot be a major or long-term solution.  There is great scope to adapt agriculture, industry and homes to efficient water use, and it's generally much cheaper.

Desalination

Hmm, climate change (or, more correctly anthropogenic global warming-AGW) has been a very convenient whipping boy for inept state government's lack of planning for the future water requirements of their states. Take Sydney...last major dam to supply the Sydney area put in over 40 years ago. Population has roughly doubled in that time, and the state governments' then express surprise that there is a water shortage, and blame AGW for their lack of infrastructure planning.

Look at the BOM data on rainfall, there has been essentially no change in average rainfall in the Murray Darling Basin (or, indeed, any of the major metropolitan catchments outside of Perth). As Ernie Bridge said, the duty of a water minister (and state governments) is to invest in the infrastructure required to meet the water requirements of the populace, not to ration the resource from an inadequate water supply infrastructure.

Now you see the panic that results from ineptitude...bloody desal plants...pfff. Time for people to make decisions based on reality, not bloody fairy floss belief systems and excuses.

Dennis

 

 

PR piffle

This topic needs facts not spin!

Victoria never needed an expensive desalination plant. In 1974 the Hamer government commissioned State River & Water Supply Commission's first major report into using the Mitchell River catchment for the states future water supply. In 1979 the Land Conservation Council recommended the construction of a dam south of Tabberabbera.

Back then the cost would have been tiny, even today a dam would cost between $1-1.5bn to build compared to the $5bn (actually $18bn over 30 years) for the Wonthaggi desalination plant. Unfortunately in 1986 the Cain govt. killed off this long-term strategic plan by creating the Mitchell River National Park for political reasons. That and the abject failure of subsequent administrations (both Labour and Liberal) to seriously plan for the state’s long-term water security, is the real story behind why Victorians face years of high priced water (more than $3000 per megalitre).

So the headline’s wrong, California does have a choice, unfortunately for many years Victorian’s didn't.

Desalination is not a good option for Climate Change

In the last 8 months Melbourne's water storages (and Victoria's in the main) have more than doubled as relief finally came from the decade long drought. There is much debate now about the wiseness or not of such an expensive locked in use or not Desal plant. But my biggest gripe is that the power it consumes will lead to more brown coal consumption (as no new renewables have been built to supply it). The stupidity of belching out more CO2 to make water , partly needed due to excess CO2 escapes the grasp of our politicians .. of both flavours. rgds. Peter

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options