Pulitzer winning climate news.
facebook twitter subscribe
view counter

EagleFordProjectPreviewBlock

BloombergLegacyPreviewBlock

BusinessDeveloperAd



CleanBreakAdAmazon

Donate to InsideClimate News through our secure page on Network for Good.

Federal Disaster Relief Intrudes on Election Debate Over Size of Government

An emergency declaration from the White House allowed federal money and responders to flow even before Sandy made landfall.

Nov 5, 2012
(Page 2 of 2 )
Damaged caused to houses from Hurricane Sandy on the New Jersey Coast

In an online editorial for Bloomberg Views, columnist and Four Percent Growth Project director Amity Shales wrote that disasters like Sandy can end up creating bigger government because of a "flood" of federal spending. "Once it rises, often to address an emergency at home or abroad, the spending doesn't recede," Shales wrote.

The Four Percent Growth Project is an arm of the George W. Bush Institute and calls for policies that promote growth from the private sector. One oft-cited 2008 paper by St. Lawrence University economics professor Steven Horwitz argues that Wal-Mart and other private retailers responded more effectively to Hurricane Katrina than the federal government, owing to their swift action and ability to move goods among the people in New Orleans.

"The incentive provided by private ownership and the knowledge provided by market signals such as prices and profits, all set in an environment of competition, create firms like Wal-Mart that are able to respond with agility and improvisation to a crisis like Katrina, and to do so with results far superior to almost all government agencies," Horwitz wrote.

ThinkProgress blogger Zack Beauchamp said the private sector argument doesn't hold water, because corporations like Wal-Mart can't provide the range of services the government does, like building houses or draining flooded areas.

"The private sector doesn't save all the people that the government bureaucracy saves," Beauchamp said in an interview. "What is the market incentive to help people when they're in dire need?"

Many conservatives say that while the private sector may not be able to do everything, it should at least play a larger role in the recovery.

On a conference call Friday about the National Flood Insurance Program, Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, said the government should be moving to privatize the program in light of Sandy, because it places too much financial burden on taxpayers. The federal program was set up in 1968 to help people who live in flood plains and may not be able to get insurance from private companies.

"The government is taking up all the oxygen in the room," because it underprices the market, Ellis said. He said the program unfairly uses taxpayer funds for a role the private insurance market should play.

Agencies Targeted for Cuts

The Small Business Administration is among the agencies that will be heavily involved in the Sandy recovery effort. It expects the storm to trigger a rush of requests for loans from its disaster relief program.

But the rush comes at a time when services provided by the SBA are already in the spotlight due to the recession. Its budget has nearly doubled since 2009 due to its backing of small business loans, and Congress has had to approve extra money for the agency. Although Ryan has backed the SBA publicly, some analysts say the agency could face cuts under his budget.

Also caught in beltway budget politics is the Federal Transit Administration, which hasn't been able to use a newly created emergency relief program designed to send money to bus and train systems damaged by storms. The transportation authorization bill passed in July created the new emergency fund, but it wasn't funded in the continuing resolution budget package that Congress approved in September.

And of course there is FEMA, which has been in the spotlight since Sandy hit. Ryan, along with other House Republicans, held up a budget in Fall 2011 by insisting that extra money FEMA spent in response to Hurricane Irene and other disasters be offset with cuts elsewhere. FEMA was eventually given its money without an offset.

The budget plan Ryan released this spring didn't specifically address FEMA, but various analyses have said it would cut FEMA's budget between 20 and 40 percent, in line with other discretionary programs. The Obama administration's proposed 2013 budget also would cut FEMA's budget by roughly 3 percent, mostly as part of an effort to streamline the agency's management.

Many conservatives have softened their positions on FEMA's funding in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.

In a statement to news organizations Wednesday, Romney said that if elected he would "ensure FEMA has the funding it needs to fulfill its mission, while directing maximum resources to the first responders who work tirelessly to help those in need, because states and localities are in the best position to get aid to the individuals and communities affected by natural disasters."

Matt Mayer, a visiting fellow for the right-leaning Heritage Foundation, told InsideClimate News that the problem isn't that the federal government responds to large events like Sandy—it's that reforms are needed when it comes to smaller disasters that only affect one or a few states.

"In a regionally catastrophic event that overwhelms an area, there's a role for the federal government," Mayer said. "The problem is that they've gotten involved in more and more routine disasters that should be paid for by the states, therefore shifting the cost to the other 49 states."

Comment space is provided for respectful discourse. Please consult our comment policies for more information. We welcome your participation in civil and constructive discussions.