Faith in the Green Climate Fund, the finance arm long believed to hold a key to achieving a global climate change accord in Paris in December, is beginning to wane.
The Green Climate Fund is supposed to be the primary distributor of tens of billions of dollars in climate aid to help the world's poorest countries deal with climate change caused primarily by the actions of others. It was designed to help heal the deep divisions between rich and poor nations that have long dimmed hopes for a meaningful global warming solution.
Editor's note: We want to introduce readers to a nonprofit news organization launching today called CALmatters. Its first story is about California's world-leading climate policies, and the hurdles that face leaders as they try to implement them. Success is crucial because California efforts are expected to provide the template for states, the federal government and other nations.
A new state-mandated report underscores how little is known about the risks associated with fracking in California, fueling a push by activists to temporarily halt the controversial practice statewide.
The study's key takeaway is that "the state does not have adequate information to effectively regulate the process," said Andrew Grinberg, oil-and-gas program manager at the environmental group Clean Water Action. "To me, it is a clear indication that a moratorium is needed."
Although several of America's biggest investor-owned utilities have seen a significant drop in their carbon footprints as they have shifted away from coal in recent years, just five––led by Duke Energy, American Electric Power and Southern––are still responsible for spewing out 25 percent of the nation's power plant carbon emissions.
Polar bears have been one of the species hit hardest by climate change over the last decade, experiencing population declines up to 40 percent in some areas. Even so, scientists have long held out hope the mammals might adapt in some way to their melting Arctic habitat and rebound––or at least stabilize in numbers––as the world continues to warm.
But new research published Thursday in the peer-reviewed journal Science deals a blow to that optimism.
One of the most sensitive unresolved questions facing negotiators of a new global climate treaty is how binding it will be.
If the treaty expected to be reached in Paris this year is without enforceable strict rules, some argue it will not be credible, while others say if nations are bound too rigidly, they won't agree to anything ambitious enough to matter. And the key to the whole conundrum is likely the United States.
The Texas flooding in May that pulled houses off foundations and swamped city streets provided a glimpse of what scientists have long warned could be its new norm because of global warming. But it did nothing to sway the state's politicians, who have done next to nothing to adjust to a climate that is already bringing more damaging extreme weather.
States looking to comply with the Clean Power Plan should follow the Northeast's example, a new analysis says.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker joined the crowded field of Republican contenders vying for the White House in 2016 on Monday, and immediately stands out for having one of the poorest records on environmental and climate issues, according to green groups and political experts.
A critical piece of the funding needed to transition to a low-carbon world—bond financing for climate-saving projects—grew by 20 percent to nearly $600 billion compared to last year, but it's still short of what's needed, according to a new report.