facebook twitter subscribe

ColumbiaJournalismReview Article

InsideClimate Oil Sands

See Our Stories on Reuters

Donate to SolveClimate News

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

view counter

Bloomberg on No Dirty Coal

Nov 29, 2007
Solution: 

Good news? He doesn't live in a coal state. It doesn't appear as if he has any ties to Big Coal and its lobbyists. And best yet, he's rich -- filthy rich -- and doesn't need any dirty dollars to run his campaign. That means he won't be beholden to coal, oil, gas, or any other Big industries. Not so good news? We haven't heard so much as a peep out of him on putting a moratorium on the construction of traditional dirty coal plants. He's said that market forces plus cleaner coal will do the trick. You put a price on carbon and the incentive for cheap coal disappears, and so does a chunk of the 150 or so plants that are currently on the drawing boards, says Bloomberg. And he's touting investing in clean coal technology. It's too pie-in-the sky. This is the one area where Bloomberg gets a Needs Improvement.