Coal’s Decline Sends Arch into Bankruptcy and Activists Aiming for Its Leases

The coal industry nosedive hits the nation's second-biggest mining and production company, throwing its projects into question.

A tractor trailer navigates mounds of coal after delivering a truckload of coal to Arch Coal Terminals on June 3, 2014 in Cattletsburg, Kentucky. Credit: Luke Sharrett/Getty Images

Share this article

Arch Coal, the nation’s second-largest coal mining company, filed for bankruptcy on Monday to help shed more than $4.5 billion in debt. It throws into question the company’s current and pending projects and its effects are expected to ripple across the entire beleaguered industry.

It is the largest coal company to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States, following Alpha Natural Resources in August. Patriot Coal also filed for bankruptcy in May—for the second time in three years.

The bankruptcies come as little surprise, given that coal production has sunk to its lowest level in nearly three decades, driven mainly by federal environmental regulations and increasing competition from natural gas and renewable energy. Coal prices dropped precipitously last year.

The announcement from Arch Coal, however, has particular implications for the future of America’s coal leasing program and critical infrastructure projects, from railroads to coal export terminals. The company has pending applications to lease at least 65,000 acres of federal lands for mining, a bid for more than 40 miles of rail extension, a 38 percent stake in the proposed coal export terminal in Longview, Wash., as well as 11 coal mines.

When a company as large as Arch Coal declares bankruptcy, “I think it’s a clear indication that coal is certainly on its way out. And I think it’s an indication this nation needs to get serious about making sure this transition happens as quickly and as orderly as possible,” said Jeremy Nichols, climate and energy program director for WildEarth Guardians, a Denver-based conservation group. According to Nichols, this should signal federal regulators to reject the company’s pending applications for permits for new coal mines and coal mine extensions on federally owned land.

For now, Arch Coal’s permit for a new Colorado lease remains under review, and the company has already asked regulators at the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management to put its Wyoming lease applications on hold, according to Jessica Kershaw, an Interior Department spokeswoman. Kershaw said she did not know of a case in which regulators denied a coal company’s permit application because of a bankruptcy filing, but she said officials do consider whether a company can maintain an active operation during the application process.

WildEarth Guardians sent a letter to Arch chairman and chief executive John Eaves on Monday asking him to withdraw all the company’s pending federal coal lease applications, among other steps, to reduce the company’s liability.

“If Arch were to obtain these leases, the company faces at least $703 million in financial commitments, although likely higher, a sum that it cannot currently afford. It seems absurd to believe that the company now or in the future could shoulder such liability,” the activists wrote in the letter.

The group also recommended Arch Coal relinquish its federal coal leases in Wyoming, at sites where no coal production is currently taking place—as well as commit to paying for the eventual cleanup and rehabilitation of land it is currently mining.

Ending the leasing of coal on public lands has become a target of environmental groups, including WildEarth Guardians, because it is one of the federal government’s biggest carbon-polluting programs.

Arch Coal did not respond to a request for comment. But in a statement on the company’s website, the company said it plans to continue operating as usual. “Our mining operations and customer shipments will continue in the ordinary course throughout this court-supervised process,” it said.

“Today’s announcement represents another significant step in our ongoing efforts to position the company for long-term success,” Arch Coal’s Eaves said in a separate press release. The decision came after the company reached an agreement with most of its significant lenders. The process involves restructuring the debt of the company, which has about 5,000 employees.

The move “sends a signal to investors: don’t go near coal and that’s a good thing,” said Tom Sanzillo, director of finance for the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). Last year’s domestic coal production represents the lowest level since 1986, according to the U.S. Energy Information Agency. Coal prices were also much lower—by double digits—in most major U.S. coal basins compared to previous years, regulators said.

“What they should be doing is closing mines,” Sanzillo said. “From a climate perspective, it’s the right thing to do. From a market perspective, it’s also the right thing to do.”

Landowners and ranchers in Montana, for their part, are hoping Arch Coal’s announcement brings the end of a controversial proposed mine, called the Otter Creek Mine, and a related rail project that would help transport coal as far as the Longview export terminal, a proposed project on the Washington coast that Arch Coal partially owns.

The bankruptcy announcement is “just one more convincing argument that these projects should not be approved—and should not be approved for any future owner either,” said Kate French, chair of the board for the conservation and agricultural group the Northern Plains Resource Council.

In Wyoming, meanwhile, activists are concerned the company is mining without setting aside enough money to pay for reclaiming the land later, and that bankruptcy will only increase the likelihood that taxpayers will end up paying those costs.

In mid-December, the Powder River Basin Resource Council and the Western Organization of Resource Councils jointly filed a complaint with state and federal regulators asking them to investigate whether Arch Coal and its local subsidiaries could meet their bond requirements for reclaiming local mines.

State regulators responded in a letter on Dec. 21, saying they did not have any concerns about Arch Coal. Following Monday’s announcement, however, they say they are now investigating. “The agency is currently reviewing the filing and what this means for reclamation obligations for Wyoming permits. Until this runs through the legal process, the department will have no further comment,” said a statement on the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality’s website.

In response to the bankruptcy announcement, Luke Popovich, vice president of communications for the National Mining Association, said one impact that has not garnered much attention from environmentalists is how it will create “high-wage job losses—adding to the 40,000 coal mining jobs lost since 2008.”

Arch Coal “is saddled with debt and that’s because [the company] made a series of bad moves in the market,” said Sanzillo. The company should sufficiently shrink its reserves, Sanzillo argued, but that is not what it appears to be doing.

Neither did Patriot Coal, and now that company is back in bankruptcy. Sanzillo said Arch Coal “remains unrealistic about the market” and “overly optimistic” prices will rebound.