The Wind Power Variability Myth Gets Debunked, Again

Jul 17, 2009

Wind unpredictability and variability are preventing wider and more ambitious adoption of the clean power source, or so the thinking goes in some circles. But is that true?

Not according to a new review on wind power, Managing Variability, commissioned by Greenpeace and carried out by energy consultant David Milborrow.

Just because winds do not blow constantly, does not mean the power produced by them cannot be constant, the energy consultant writes. In fact:

"There are no significant barriers to the introduction of wind energy due to its variability."

Though the UK was the focus of the study, the results are relevant worldwide, as characteristics of wind are broadly similar everywhere.

Across the windswept UK, wind energy provides just one half of one percent of electricity needs right now. According to Milborrow, increasing that to 40 percent can be technically managed by Britain's existing power system with modest — and even declining — costs.

In fact, British utility National Grid went so far as to conclude that that there is no 'ceiling' on the amount of wind-generated electricity that can be accommodated. It wrote in its Seven Year Statement last year:

"Based on recent analysis of the incidence and variation of wind speed the expected intermittency of the national wind portfolio would not appear to pose a technical ceiling on the amount of wind generation that may be accommodated and adequately managed."

The reason is simple. Contrary to popular perception, wind energy is not totally random and unpredictable. For one, the wind very rarely stops blowing everywhere at once. As Milborrow points out,

"Nothing will happen when the wind stops blowing, simply because it never stops blowing, suddenly, over the whole of the British Isles."

Truth is, no generation is 100 percent reliable. And energy from wind gusts is actually more manageable than most other options. The report finds that relative to dirtier conventional sources, fluctuations from the power output of wind installations are mild. More wind may even improve grid resilience.

"Thermal plant outputs, such as nuclear, coal and gas-fired power plants are truly 'intermittent,' in as much as they can disappear without warning when components fail, posing a greater threat to the stability of electricity networks than the relatively benign fluctuations of power output from wind installations."

For evidence, the study examined Western Denmark, where wind power made up 26 percent of electricity generation in 2007. Specifically, it looked at the changes in demand that had to be managed as the region boosted its wind share.

If there had been no wind power in 2007, the maximum one-hour increase in system demand would have been 675 MW. What happened with 26 percent wind? Turns out, not a whole lot.

"Sometimes the wind fluctuations augmented the demand fluctuations, sometimes they reduced them. The maximum increase in demand that the System Operator had to deal with went up from 675 MW to 900 MW. In that hour, there was an increase in demand at the same time as the output from the wind plant fell.

"However, the number of times that the net demand increased by more than 600 MW in an hour only went up from 55 (consumer demands only) to 63 (consumer demand net of wind production)."

In Britain, projections look similar. As reported in Recharge, calculations made by Oxford University Environmental Change Institute show that between 1970-2003, low wind speeds — those too slow to generate energy — occurred one hour per year on average across the UK.

All these numbers add up to a simple fact: Assimilation of wind is not a serious problem, anywhere. As Milborrow wrote:

"Electricity utilities around the world have examined the implications of absorbing wind energy and most have concluded that the additional costs are modest and there are no insuperable difficulties."

Perhaps the best proof of this is that wind is poised to become a major contributor to renewable energy targets in most of Europe. And these targets are substantial.

In Ireland, renewables output could leap to 40 percent of the nation's electricity share; in Denmark to 33 percent; in Portugal to 28 percent; and in Germany and Greece to 25 percent.

As Milborrow notes, wind energy worldwide continues to grow at around 25 percent per yer, despite the recession, which suggests

"utilities and governments see it as a reliable source of carbon-free electricity generation."

In the U.S., the world's top wind producer, wind currently makes up just one percent of the energy supply. But the Department of Energy has found there is no fundamental technical reason why 20 percent of wind energy cannot be assimilated into the grid by 2030. Not one.

To help make its point, the agency debunks the reliability myth in its fact sheet on Wind Energy Myths:

The utility system is ... designed to accommodate load fluctuations, which occur continuously. This feature also facilitates accommodation of wind plant output fluctuations. In Denmark, Northern Germany, and parts of Spain, wind supplies 20% to 40% of electric loads without sacrificing reliability. When wind is added to a utility system, no new backup is required to maintain system reliability.

Of course, managing variability will carry economic costs, everywhere. But, as the Greenpeace report found, these aren't very significant at all and should plummet due to coming technology advancements. In Britain, at least,

"it is concluded that the additional costs associated with variability – with wind power providing up to about 40% of all electricity, are quite small."

Specifically, if wind were to provide 22 percent of electricity by 2020 in the UK, which is what modeling for government suggests will happen, variability costs would increase the domestic electricity price by about 2 percent.

As SolveClimate previously reported, there are technical innovations at various stages of development that can mitigate the costs associated with variability, most notably in wind forecasting.

The Greenpeace study found that if used to its full potential, more accurate forecasting could slash the costs associated with wind variability by nearly one third.

And keep in mind, wind energy is a proven boon for economies, generating more high-quality, skilled jobs than any other energy sector.

 

See also:

Technology Takes on Wind Power's Biggest Challenge: Predictability

Wind Power Has Lightest Footprint – Carbon and Otherwise

'B' Overall: America's 20% Wind Power Progress Gets Graded

Smart Grid: Digging The Foundations

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Email LinkedIn RSS RSS Instagram YouTube