The Climate Ambition Summit Was Notably Unambitious, Advocates Say

Top-polluting nations were absent from the event. One activist compared the new climate pledges announced at the summit to “trying to put out an inferno with a leaking hose.”

Share this article

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - SEPTEMBER 20: US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry attends Climate Ambition Summit at the United Nations Headquarters on September 20, 2023 in New York City. The event, held during Climate Week NYC and the UN General Assembly, seeks to gather support for global agreements aimed at phasing out the use of fossil fuels. (Photo by Kena Betancur/Getty Images)

Share this article

For a conference aimed at inspiring world leaders to dramatically ramp up their efforts to combat climate change, the United Nations’ Climate Ambition Summit was anything but ambitious.

That’s the message from climate activists after the day-long special summit came to a close without any notable commitments from the nations most responsible for causing global warming. The event was held Wednesday in New York City during the U.N. General Assembly.

“There is simply a huge mismatch between the depth of actions governments and businesses are taking and the transformative shifts that are needed to address the climate crisis,” David Waskow, director of the World Resources Institute’s International Climate Initiative, wrote in a statement shortly after the summit adjourned. “And some of the biggest emitters were noticeably absent from the stage.”

But the countries missing from the talks—the United States, China, India, Russia, France and the United Kingdom—were left out by design. The leaders of those nations, which altogether account for more than half the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, were not invited by U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres to speak at the summit in order to send a message: Step up your climate game or we’re all in trouble.

The world is not on track to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, the U.N. warned in a major report earlier this month. Guterres reiterated that warning in his opening speech Wednesday, noting that Earth would warm by an average of 2.8 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels by the end of the century—well beyond the targets set by the international climate pact—if far more isn’t done by top-polluting nations. The U.S. and other wealthy nations have drawn criticism from Guterres and other climate advocates in recent years for not only failing to curb their use of fossil fuels, but actually expanding it, often justifying broken climate promises on rising inflation and the Russian war in Ukraine.

In fact, the U.K. walked back one of its climate commitments as the summit was underway. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced that the country’s plan to ban new gas and diesel cars by 2030 would now go into effect in 2035, saying the previous goal would impose “unacceptable costs” on U.K. citizens. 

The move was one of many decisions by wealthy countries over the last two years that have disappointed climate activists and raised concerns among scientists, who say the window to slow down global warming enough to avoid its worst consequences in the coming decades is quickly closing, despite whatever the market forces and geopolitical circumstances may be.

“The move from fossil fuels to renewables is happening, but we are decades behind,” Guterres said in his speech. “We must make up time lost to foot-dragging, arm-twisting and the naked greed of entrenched interests raking in billions from fossil fuels.”

That’s not to say there was nothing for climate activists to celebrate at the Climate Ambition Summit. Several nations have made more ambitious commitments this year, which they touted at the event. 

Germany announced it would keep its promise to add $2 billion to the Green Climate Fund, which helps pay for clean energy and climate adaptation projects in developing countries. Denmark announced it was moving forward with its plan to reach net zero emissions by 2045 rather than 2050. The Marshall Islands, a Pacific Island nation that plays an outsized role in global shipping, announced it would join more than a dozen other countries in their pledge to phase out oil and gas. Brazil announced that by 2030, it would end deforestation in the Amazon rainforest and slash national emissions in half, rather than its previous pledge of 43 percent. Thailand also touted a recent update to its 2030 climate goals, saying it will reduce the country’s emissions by 40 percent instead of 20 percent. And at least 67 countries signed a new global pact aimed at protecting the oceans from ecological degradation and biodiversity loss.

There were positive announcements outside the summit, too, regarding two of the world’s most carbon-intensive materials—cement and steel. A Los Angeles–based company announced it had found a way to drastically reduce the carbon footprint of its cement. And several major companies, including tech giant Microsoft and real estate developer Trammell Crow, announced a new “green steel” pledge, aimed at reducing the industry’s carbon emissions by 2 million metric tons a year.

Still, activists said those announcements—though welcomed—are unlikely to change the planet’s current trajectory. “The small steps countries offered are welcome,” Waskow said, “but they’re like trying to put out an inferno with a leaking hose.”

With the COP28 climate talks now just two months away, many advocates worry that Wednesday’s summit was a clear sign that a deal to phase out fossil fuels worldwide remains beyond reach. Each year that passes without such a deal, they say, only reduces the chances of achieving the Paris Agreement’s targets and makes addressing climate impacts more costly for everyone.

“All eyes are now on COP28,” Waskow said. “The onus is especially on the world’s wealthy countries and biggest emitters to step up both by drastically cutting their own emissions and showing solidarity with climate-vulnerable countries.”

More Top Climate News

Climate Change Made Deadly Libya Flooding 50 Times More Likely: Researchers say the extreme rainfall and flooding that has killed thousands of people in Libya this month was made 50 times more likely and 50 percent more intense because of human-caused global warming, Laura Paddison reports for CNN. The analysis, done by the World Weather Attribution initiative, also found the extreme rainfall that hit Greece, Turkey and Bulgaria was made up to 10 times more likely. The findings come as much of the Mediterranean dealt with historic rainfall this summer.

Climate Change Exacerbated a National Blood Shortage: Health experts are warning that climate change is partly to blame for the nation’s shortage of donated blood, with the stockpile reaching “critically low levels” this summer, Ariel Wittenberg reports for E&E News. According to the American Red Cross and other blood donation organizations, severe weather has increasingly disrupted blood collection in recent years, forcing many people intending to donate blood to cancel their appointments. The Red Cross has seen its blood supply drop nearly 25 percent since August.

Twitter Ranked Dead Last on Climate Misinformation Scorecard: In a new assessment of several major social media platforms, X, formerly known as Twitter, came in dead last in managing climate misinformation, Angely Mercado reports for Gizmodo. The report, released this week by the watchdog coalition Climate Action Against Disinformation, evaluated social media platforms on transparency, advertising, policy content and rule enforcement in regards to climate misinformation. X scored just 1 out of a possible 21 points, the report said.

Today’s Indicator

39 million

That’s how many U.S. properties—roughly a quarter of all homes in the country—are being underpriced for the insurance risks they face due to wildfires, flooding and other consequences of climate change, according to a new report from First Street Foundation.

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Share this article