This story was updated on Aug. 11
If actions do indeed speak louder than words, plants and animals are telling us in no uncertain terms that human-caused climate change is changing their lives—with potentially dire consequences for the ecosystem.
According to one of the largest troves of ecological data from the past, living organisms are already responding to the rise in temperatures from global warming. More than 11,000 records from the 19th century that chronicled the flowering of plants and trees, the springtime arrival of migrating birds, and the annual onset of frog mating calls, have been digitized, using data from researchers at the Hawthorne Valley Farmscape Ecology Program in Harlemville, N.Y. An analysis by research ecologist Kerissa Battle and Celia Cuomo of Community Greenways Collaborative shows that spring is arriving as much as 14 days early as climate change accelerates.
The observations were recorded at more than 90 scientific academies across New York State between 1832 and 1862 as part of a statewide effort organized by the University of the State of New York.
“As far as we can tell it’s the largest [historical] data set from North America,” said Conrad Vispo, who recently uncovered the long-forgotten documents and heads the Hawthorne Valley Farmscape Ecology Program’s Progress of the Seasons project.
Vispo, an adjunct professor of horticulture at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., is working with th Community Greenways Collaborative to track the impact of climate change on plants and pollinators and compare the timing of historical observations with seasonal changes today. A preliminary analysis of five common species from New York’s southern Hudson Valley by the Community Greenways Collaborative shows plants and trees are flowering from two days to two weeks earlier than they were in the mid-1800s, as the temperatures recorded in the region increased between 2 and 4 degrees Fahrenheit.
“It would suggest that there have been changes in the climate that have had broad impacts on the timing of natural events,” Vispo said.
The results are comparable to recent analyses of other historic observations, including those by two luminaries of the environmental movement, naturalist Henry Thoreau and conservation biologist Aldo Leopold.
Plants such as nodding trillium and serviceberry now bloom 11 days earlier on average in Concord, Mass. than in the mid 1800s when Thoreau made his observations, according to a recent study published in the Public Library of Science One. The change is even more dramatic in central Wisconsin where Leopold made his observations. Species like woodland phlox and wild geranium bloomed on average 24 days earlier in 2012 than they did in 1945 when Leopold recorded his last observations.
The changing phenology—the timing of seasonal plant and animal phenomenon—could portend large disruptions to the ecosystem.
“It’s not just going for a walk and seeing flowers earlier, it’s a much larger issue,” said Elizabeth Ellwood, a researcher at Florida State University and lead author of the study comparing Thoreau and Leopold’s observations to seasonal changes seen today. “At some point, some species likely won’t be able to keep up with earlier phenology that warming temperatures have dictated.”
Bees that depend on plants to flower at a specific time so that they can feed their young from the pollen are an example of an insect that could be highly susceptible to changing bloom times, Vispo said. Farmers rely on the nation’s bees, already in steep decline from pesticide use, disease and climate change, to pollinate their crops.
“If changes in [the bee’s] timing are not keeping up with the changes in the flowering times of their target plants, then you have a disconnect that might affect their populations,” he said.
Another related study by Ellwood from 2010 found several birds species including the fox sparrow and purple finch that Thoreau observed as they returned to Concord, Mass from their southern migrations each year now remain in the region year round.
“Some plants depend on a cold winter and that period of dormancy to then pop out in spring,” said Ellwood, who did not take part in either study. “If winter was so warm that they don’t recognize a difference between winter and spring then we might see delayed phenology. We might see them being susceptible to other negative effects of that uncommon climate and temperature.”
Richard Primack, a professor at Boston University and a co-author on the studies comparing Thoreau’s observations to seasonal changes seen today, said flowers are the canary in the coal mine for more dire changes to come.
“In the New England area it’s quite likely that by the end of the century that we will have severe heat waves during the summer, rising sea levels, and a lot of our forest trees might start dying because of both higher temperatures and insect attacks,” he said. “In many ways it’s kind of nice having things flower earlier because we have such a long winter, but there are going to be very big consequences for that.”