<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Inside Climate News</provider_name><provider_url>https://insideclimatenews.org</provider_url><author_name>climate-admin</author_name><author_url>https://insideclimatenews.org/news/author/climate-admin/</author_url><title>Oh, Those Sexy Building Codes: More Effective Than 100 Nuclear Plants - Inside Climate News</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/23072009/oh-those-sexy-building-codes-more-effective-100-nuclear-plants/"&gt;Oh, Those Sexy Building Codes: More Effective Than 100 Nuclear Plants&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(c,d){"use strict";var e=!1,n=!1;if(d.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},!c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,a,i,s=d.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=d.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=0;o&lt;n.length;o++)n[o].style.display="none";for(o=0;o&lt;s.length;o++)if(r=s[o],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;r.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(a=d.createElement("a"),i=d.createElement("a"),a.href=r.getAttribute("src"),i.href=t.value,i.host===a.host)if(d.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener("message",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),d.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),c.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!n){n=!0;for(var e,t,r=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),i=d.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),s=0;s&lt;i.length;s++){if(!(e=i[s]).getAttribute("data-secret"))t=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t);if(r||a)(t=e.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://insideclimatenews.org/news/23072009/oh-those-sexy-building-codes-more-effective-100-nuclear-plants/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Oh, Those Sexy Building Codes: More Effective Than 100 Nuclear Plants&#x201D; &#x2014; Inside Climate News" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><thumbnail_url>https://insideclimatenews.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Arch20302.gif</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>708</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>574</thumbnail_height><description>Buried deep within the 1,428-page American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) bill, is Section 201, pages 320&#x2013;348. It is this section that makes H.R. 2454 worth passing. No matter what else is compromised or changed in the climate bill now working its way through the Senate, Section 201 must not be changed or weakened. Why? [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
