facebook twitter subscribe

ColumbiaJournalismReview Article

InsideClimate Oil Sands

See Our Stories on Reuters

Donate to SolveClimate News

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

view counter

The Vision Thing (Part I)

"The best way to predict the future is to design it." –Buckminster Fuller

For some time now I have been proposing a national vision project – a conversation among the American people about the positive future we can create if we put our minds to it. That idea may have gained some momentum his month in a converted barn on the Rockefeller estate outside New York City.

With the help of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation, we convened 30 people – a yeasty mix of communications wizards, sustainable development experts and philanthropists – to determine if they are interested in working together to launch that national discussion. They are.

I don’t yet know what shape this initiative will take, but I know why it’s necessary. As Paul Ray and Sherry Ruth Anderson put it in their book, The Cultural Creatives: How 50 Million People Are Changing the World:

Today, as we are besieged by planetary problems, the risk is that we will deal with them in a pessimistic and unproductive style. …Transfixed by an image of our own future decline, we could actually bring it about.

Have we reached the point that Ray and Anderson warn us about, helpless and depressed, immobilized like deer in the headlights by the frequent damage reports from climate scientists and apocalyptic images of civilization’s collapse?

You be the judge. If you have a few minutes, go to these links and watch:

The Day After Tomorrow

Six Degrees Could Change the World

Eleventh Hour

The Day the Earth Stood Still

Similar dark images of the future have appeared in books and on television specials. Even Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth, the climate movement’s cinematic equivalent of the cerebral A Dinner with Andre, starts with a dread-invoking dose of disaster.

These days, we don’t have to rely on fiction to imagine civilization under siege. The images show up regularly in the news as the effects of climate change manifest in the United States and elsewhere, much earlier than we thought just a few years ago.

Go to these links for examples from the past 12 months, compliments of the Boston Globe: Wildfires, Hurricanes, Floods, More Floods.

For whatever reason – perhaps there’s something in our psychology that makes destruction more entertaining than construction – we are being exposed to many more apocalyptic images than images of a post-carbon world that can be positive and prosperous, even as we deal with the impacts of climate change that already are inevitable.

If Ray and Anderson are correct, the lack of balance between positive and negative visions could be our undoing.

For contrast, we might look at what previous generations have done in times of overwhelming challenge. The poster campaigns of World War II were calls to action rather than invitations to despair.

The Bright Green Wave

Mr. Becker, I am with you 500%. And so are hundreds of thousands of others.

Here are a few more important optimistic future visions to add to the list:

Paul Hawken describes the "blessed unrest" as a turn away from "doom and gloom" environmentalism and the largest movement in all human history.

Alex Steffen of worldchanging.com describes the new environmental politics as "the politics of optimism" versus the "politics of the impossible." The new political optimists, most under 30, in Steffen's words "resist the lure of the narrative of collapse" in favor of an "eyes wide open optimism" that sees how bad things are, but that does not make them blind to how amazing they can be. Steffen has coined the term "Bright Greens" to describe these new savvy, tech-wise environmental optimists.

Steffen also writes, "any future vision of sustainability that does not include human happiness is bound to fail."

The Tellus Institute out of Cambridge, Mass. elaborates on the same theme of happiness in their future scenario, "The Great Transition." As the folks at Tellus put it (www.tellus.org) "imperative" and "necessity" combine with the "lure of happiness" to drive us toward a new world.

The emerging economies of well-being and happiness are also giving us a new economic framework for transitioning to a post-carbon world by pointing up the obvious but unspoken: Wasting all our amazing human creativity and intelligence on maintaining a toxic world is a waste and a shame. Happiness lies with sustainability.

Arguably the most remarkable, positive future visioning is coming out of the Institute For The Future in San Francisco. The IFTF is deriving its positive environmental future scenario from a huge multi-player game held in the fall, 2008; the object of the game was to stave off human extinction by 2042. Called Superstruct, the game allowed players to create "super structures," new systems, initiatives, policies, inventions to keep humanity thriving. The ITFT is sifting through the many superstructures citizens created, now. (www.itft.org)

Necessity + Happiness
Undaunted Politics of Optimism
blessedly restlessly cultural creatives all over
and citizen-up-and-out super structures to wrest humanity from the maw of extinction: not bad times to be alive at all, I'd say.

Time to get Americans to ride the positive, bright green wave.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options