facebook twitter subscribe

Donate to SolveClimate News

Friends of the Earth Goes it Alone: Urges 'No' on Climate Bill

The House climate bill took another hit this week as Rep. Henry Waxman made further concessions, this time to farm-state Democrats, to ensure the bill's safe passage on Friday. Even weakened, though, the bill continued to draw support from most of the big environmental organizations.

Except for Friends of the Earth. The organization is going it alone with an ad campaign and request to its members to demand better legislation from Congress. FOE President Brent Blackwelder is publicly urging Congress to either substantially strengthen the bill or vote no.

“Corporate polluters including Shell and Duke Energy helped write this bill, and the result is that we’re left with legislation that fails to come anywhere close to solving the climate crisis,” Blackwelder wrote.

“Worse, the bill eliminates preexisting EPA authority to address global warming—that means it's actually a step backward.

“This exercise in politics as usual is a wholly unacceptable response to one of the greatest challenges of our time, and it endangers the welfare of current and future generations. … If the ‘political reality’ at present cannot accommodate stronger legislation, their first task must be to expand what is politically possible—not to pass a counterproductive bill.”

That position hasn’t been easy hasn't been easy to take. Some of the largest environmental groups, including NRDC and EDF, were involved with Shell and Duke in the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a consortium that wrote the industry-environment compromise that the American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) bill is based on. Groups that have questioned the legislation have been pressured to back off.

Blackwelder has also been pressured to support the bill, as well as to delay releasing an FOE report that looked into Wall Street’s expectations for the bill's cap-and-trade program and the high potential for gaming and corruption in a carbon-trading system.

“We’re getting a lot of criticism, but we’ve spoken honestly about the defects we see in this bill and that this is going to be a setback,” Blackwelder told SolveClimate. “If you have a proposal that can’t stand the light of day, then it’s time someone said ‘Hey, the emperor has no clothes!’”

When Reps. Waxman and Ed Markey accepted U.S. CAP’s compromise as the foundation for their climate bill, they set the bar too low, Blackwelder said.

“If you’re going to deal from a low point, it’s only going to go lower. Now, we’ve got a deal that will basically eviscerate biofuels standards," he said, referring to the latest concessions for farm-state Democrats. "It’s just one thing after another.”

“We’re going to stand up for what the science calls for and point out the flaws.”

It’s unlikely at this point that House Democrats will attempt to strengthen a bill that they’ve already watered down to win what could be a close vote on the House floor Friday.

Under House Minority Leader John Boehner's orders, Republicans have almost uniformly lined up in opposition. Some coal-state and Midwestern Democrats, despite the concessions Rep. Collin Peterson wrung from the bill's sponsors this week, could still oppose the bill, as could some on the left who oppose cap-and-trade or say the ACES bill in its current form simply doesn't do enough.

The Rules Committee set a 9:30 a.m. Thursday deadline for submitting amendments to the ACES bill. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and a few other House members are quietly considering amendments, however the Rules Committee would not say how many had been submitted as of today.

Greenpeace isn’t counting on amendments strengthening the bill now, though the group is remaining "agnostic" on the vote, spokesman Daniel Kessler said.

“We will keep calling upon President Obama to stick to his campaign pledge to stand with the science. He can act administratively or insert himself into the House debate, and its only through his leadership that we stand a chance against all of the politics and special interests," he said.

AttachmentSize
LCV Letter on ACES.pdf173.22 KB
29-Group ACES Letter.pdf60.71 KB

Comments

Urging 'No' on Climate Bill

This article is out of control, as are ALL of the environmental loons... I am for protecting the Planet as much as anyone, but you people have no idea the negative impact that this ridiculous will have on everyone in this country.

When are any of you going to get it through your thick skulls that there is no such thing as global warming? When are you going to get it that the hysterical loons have changed the term global warming to global climate change due to the fact that the emperical data shows that there is no such thing as global warming? When are the fools going to get it that we have little impact on the earth, and that you canot change the natural evolution of the planet?

This type of hysterical fear is so ignorant, it's pathetic. The fact that so many actualy buy into this garbage is even more pathetic and solidifies my continued belief that Americans are stupid, and get dumber by the day...

Facts are facts, people, and the facts tell me that none of you really have any clue what you are talking about, yet you continue the ignorance. The ONLY people that REALLY know that they are talking about, relative "global climate change" are geologists, and they strongly disagree with the loons...but then you liberal whackos never like the truth, do you?

Facts are Facts

Dear C Strasburger

The science of climate change is quite clear, and science is the place most people turn for empirical facts.

You are entitled to your opinion, and we will leave your rant here for all to read, but it doesn't change the facts.

FoE not alone - widespread

Actually - this article is a bit misleading, and Solve Climate has even had past articles that it seems to have ignored when writing this one.

Many groups (environmental, consumer, and beyond) have come out either in strong opposition to Waxman-Markey, or at least been publicly critical over it's shortcomings.

Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, Public Citizen, and a dozen more groups signed a broad statement a few weeks ago (link below) recognizing that the bill (as it was then) was woefully off base with the best climate science.The bill has since been further watered down, and many more groups have come out vocally opposing the bill.

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/press-center/releases2/broad-coalition-cri...

In addition, the EPA just issued a report (http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2009/06/24/epa-sees-limited-re...) citing that renewable energy deployment could actually decrease with the passage of W-M. Leading scientists like NASA's James Hansen aren't supporting the bill. Most Environmental Justice groups are opposing the bill. And the list goes on.

FOE Has Gone a Step Farther

We covered Greenpeace's opposition (see Greenpeace: We Cannot Support This Climate Bill) and have reprinted Hansen's opinion (Temple of Doom.)

FOE is going a step further than others from what we can tell -- they are actively urging a "no" vote and running an ad campaign behind it. We spoke to Greenpeace and quoted them in the article -- and their position is agnostic on the bill. EJ groups have been opposed to cap and trade on principle for a long time, and we have covered that too.

We are not trying to mislead but to highlight what is new is this charged context, and to give mention of the range of stances.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options