facebook twitter subscribe

Donate to SolveClimate News

InsideClimate Oil Sands

ColumbiaJournalismReview Article

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

See Our Stories on Reuters

view counter

Insurance CEOs Call on Industry to Get Proactive About Climate Change

The insurance industry is in a unique position in the fight against climate change: It can encourage behavior changes simply by doing what so many governments have avoided – putting a price on ignoring the danger.

Just as insurance discounts can encourage safe driving practices, insurers can persuade their clients to embrace energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions with financial incentives. Their massive investment power can further pressure corporations and states to take action.

The self-interest is obvious: The potential for insured losses is enormous as global warming brings on stronger storms, longer droughts and more intense heat waves.

“Perhaps no industry is more aligned with the world’s self-interest in preventing the destructive effects of climate change than the insurance industry,” says Mike McGavick, CEO of XL Capital Ltd.

Just look at some of the recent numbers:

    ✻ Severe flooding in central Europe in August 2002 caused damages estimated at 15 billion to 20 billion euros, about 0.7 percent of the countries' combined GDP.

    ✻ France’s deadly 2003 heatwave cost agriculture alone about 4 billion euros.

    Hurricane Katrina in 2005 resulted in losses of about $125 billion, just under 1 percent of the United States’ GDP.

    ✻ In Kenya, droughts in 1999 and 2000 racked up damage amounting to 16 percent of GDP, about a quarter of it due to hydropower loss.

Yet, even though insurers are the masters of risk assessment, they're still stuck in reactive mode when it comes to climate change, a group of insurance CEOs and climate experts writes in a new report from the International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics, better known as the Geneva Association.

The investor network Ceres, which follows the industry, came to a similar conclusion earlier this year, writing: “The scale of risk this industry faces — and the opportunities that can be capture by those who act — call for much more dramatic and far-reaching action.”

Both reports give dozens of examples of how insurers have taken positive steps to help corporations reduce their exposure to climate change — Ceres found a 50 percent increase in climate-related activity by insurers from 2007 to 2008. Yet both also see a far greater, untapped potential.

“Climate change represents the greatest long-term challenge to the industry,” the CEOs write in the Geneva Association report.

Their report spells out in detail the threats that civilization — and the companies putting up trillions of dollars to insure it — face as the planet warms and climates change.

Accompanying it is a statement signed by 56 industry leaders affirming their commitment to climate change research, products that incentivize reducing greenhouse gas emissions, services that support climate change adaptation, and investments in clean energy products.

“Climate change is considered as one of the most serious risks which could affect the whole socio-economic structure of any country in the world," the report's authors write.

“Climate change has caused a rise in average temperatures, localized torrential rain, drought and water shortages in various parts of the world. These phenomena have caused not only damages to property but have also led to economic losses such as the deprivation of income opportunities, which are all as a result of natural disasters. Further more, climate change will also have a serious impact on human life, health, the ecosystem, biodiversity, which also needs to be considered.

insurance

I really want to see what insurance companies will do in the health department after the Obama law will pass.

Although insurance CEOs are

Although insurance CEOs are more concerned about climate change than CEOs in other sectors, they are less likely to be preparing for climate-change initiatives in the coming twelve months. This split vision may stem from the fact that most insurers believe climate change is not particularly relevant to their internal business models, although it has huge potential consequences for non-life companies, because it increases the risk of natural disasters. Re-insurers and property casualty firms have taken a leading role in lobbying for co-ordinated remedies and must stick to their task. Anyway thanks a lot for the useful information and for the ability to express my own opinion. Regards, Peter Dickson from California insurance

At first I didn't understand

At first I didn't understand what do insurance industry has to do with the climate change... Now I understand that an active implication from insurers can make the difference. For sure the auto industry will be among the first industry affected by the insurance changes.

I am glad to see this...

There is little doubt that Global Warming is happening. With that will be disease and deteriorated health The cause and effect will be more insurance claims that will drive insurance prices to through the roof. Thanks for sharing, this was the most interesting read of the day.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options