facebook twitter subscribe

ColumbiaJournalismReview Article

InsideClimate Oil Sands

See Our Stories on Reuters

Donate to SolveClimate News

Once a day
Get Articles by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

Also
Get Today's Climate by e-mail:

or subscribe by RSS

view counter

Tipping Points: Melting Ice, Rising Oceans

Global warming IS a time bomb.

There may still be time to defuse it, but that requires policy-makers to take the actions that are needed, not the ineffectual actions they are discussing.

Despite the publicity that global warming has received, there is a large gap between what is understood by the relevant scientific community, and what is known by the people who need to know, the public and policymakers. Global warming is small compared to day-to-day weather fluctuations, so it is hard for people to recognize that we have a crisis – but we do.

The climate system has great inertia, caused, e.g., by the 4-kilometer-deep ocean and the thick ice sheets on Antarctica and Greenland, which have only partly responded to the human-made changes of atmospheric composition. That inertia is not our friend. It is a Trojan horse. By the time the public notices that change is underway the momentum of the climate system may be sufficient to guarantee much larger changes. The climate system can pass tipping points, such that large change continues out of our control.

The bad news is that we have already passed into a dangerous range of atmospheric carbon dioxide.

The good news is that if we act smart and promptly it is still feasible to achieve a safe level of atmospheric gases, and the actions needed to achieve that would have multiple benefits in addition to climate stability.

There are several climate tipping points of special concern.

Tipping points are “non-linear” phenomena, which means that they can reach a point at which rapid catastrophic change occurs. It is inherently difficult to determine the time at which non-linear collapse will occur, even in cases where such rapid change is certain.

The mechanism that seems to be most important for disintegration of the great ice sheets that cover Antarctica and Greenland begins with ocean warming. Ocean warming leads to melting of ice shelves, which are tongues of ice that stretch out into the ocean. The ice shelves buttress the ice sheets, so when ice shelves disappear, the more mobile parts of the ice sheet, the ice streams, can surge into the ocean. Thus, removal of the ice shelves is somewhat akin to taking the cork out of a bottle — it allows the material behind to flow rapidly.

We know from Earth’s history that once ice sheet disintegration is well underway, sea level can rise by several meters per century.

Let’s look more at processes contributing to ice sheet disintegration.

We have accurate satellite measurements of the area on Greenland with summer melting on the snow and ice surface. The area with melting fluctuates from year to year, depending on year-to-year weather fluctuations, but there is a long-term increase of the melt area.

The area with summer melting is shown by the red area, with maps for 1992 and 2007, the years with the least and most melt area. The trend has an increase of 50 percent in melt area during the past three decades.

The meltwater runs to a low spot on the ice surface, where it burrows a hole in the ice sheet that carries the water all the way to base of the ice sheet.

There, the meltwater lubricates the base of the ice sheet, accelerating the discharge of giant icebergs to the ocean.

This is one of the processes causing ice loss from Greenland and Antarctica to increase.

Another process, probably even more effective than surface melt, is melting of ice shelves by warmer ocean water.

Ice shelves are tongues of ice extending from the large ice sheets into the ocean. They buttress the large ice sheet, helping to keep it in place. As a warming ocean melts the ice shelves, icebergs begin to stream more rapidly into the ocean. Until recently, some scientists argued that global warming may cause ice sheets to grow, because a warmer atmosphere holds more water vapor and thus produces greater winter snowfall. Of course, common sense suggests that the ice sheets will become smaller as the planet becomes warmer, but accurate measurements are needed to prove what is happening.

Dr. Syun-Ichi Akasofu, IARC

Dr. Syun-Ichi Akasofu, IARC Founding Director and Professor of Physics, Emeritus, was the the director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks from its establishment in 1998 until January of 2007

Google this article on "alaskareport" which highlights Akasofu's findings:

'Climate skeptic' questions conventional thinking

"If you look back far enough, we have a bunch of data that show that warming has gone on from the 1600s with an almost linear increase to the present," Akasofu said. He showed ice core data from the Russian Arctic that shows warming starting from the early 1700s, temperature records from England showing the same trend back to 1660, and ice breakup dates at Tallinn, Estonia, that show a general warming since the year 1500.

Akasofu said scientists who support the manmade greenhouse gas theory disregard information from centuries ago when exploring the issue of global warming. Satellite images of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean have only been available in the satellite era since the 1960s and 1970s."

tipping points

I agree with your discussion here and I just want to add that there is another tipping point that we are close to that seems to me to be a strong positive feedback loop synergistically linked to the loss of Arctic ice. Namely the warming of permafrost leading to large scale release of stores of carbon. Several recent articles I think tell a story that points to the possibility that carbon releases in the form of methane and CO2 from long frozen materials in the lands surrounding the Arctic could soon eclipse coal burning in importance.

Ping, C.-L., G. J. Michaelson, et al. (2008). "High stocks of soil organic carbon in the North American Arctic region." Nature Geosci 1(9): 615-619.

Walter, K. M., S. A. Zimov, et al. (2006). "Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming." Nature 443(7107): 71-75.

Mastepanov, M., C. Sigsgaard, et al. (2008). "Large tundra methane burst during onset of freezing." Nature 456(7222): 628-630.

Lawrence, D. M., A. G. Slater, et al. (2008). "Accelerated Arctic land warming and permafrost degradation during rapid sea ice loss." Geophys. Res. Lett. 35.

1998 was a RECORD hot year

1998 was a RECORD hot year.
That's why the denialists use it as a reference point to claim the Earth has been cooling.

As El Nino picks up this year, and probably more next year, we should get a good confirmation of what's really going on.

Copy and Paste

Your copy and past comment is getting old and tired.

By the way, what do you think accounts for the dramatic loss of Greenland and Antarctic ice?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options