"America’s First Offshore Wind Farm" – the tag line of the proposed Cape Wind Project – has been more wishful thinking than fact for eight years. That may be changing.
This week, a majority of the members of the Massachusetts Legislature – 107 out of 200 – signed a letter urging U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to approve the wind farm "as soon as possible."
What’s significant about this letter is not the content per se; it’s that far more legislators have signed it since it was first delivered just a month ago – almost 30 more since April 6.
It’s just the latest evidence that the tides are quickly turning on the 130-turbine wind farm proposal for Nantucket Sound, a project that has faced relentless "Not In My Back Yard," or NIMBY, opposition. Here are some other signs of progress:
- On January 16, 2009, the Minerals Management Service released its final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project, concluding that the project poses no significant environmental threat.
- On March 12, 2009, the Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board voted unanimously to issue Cape Wind a tentative "super permit," knocking off nine state and local approvals it needs to build the turbines. A final approval, which is likely, is expected soon.
- On April 10, 2009, the 17-member board of the highly respected Cape Cod environmental organization, the Association to Preserve Cape Cod, came out unanimously in favor of Cape Wind for the first time.
- On April 22, 2009, Earth Day, President Obama announced that the U.S. Department of the Interior has finalized a long-awaited framework for renewable energy production on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) that could clear the regulatory thicket on offshore wind development.
- On May 4, 2009, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Vice President Joe Biden visited the University of Delaware where they both underscored the importance of developing America’s offshore wind potential on the OCS.
Interior Secretary Salazar, for his part, has been heavily touting the nation’s untapped offshore wind resource during the last few months. He frequently quotes a study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, which found more than 1,000 gigawatts of wind potential off the Atlantic coast. The entire electricity-generation capacity of the U.S. is just over that number.
None of this new-found support means that Cape Wind is a done deal. A well-heeled and expert cadre of NIMBY activists, led by Sen. Edward Kennedy and The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, remains hell-bent on stopping what it sees as a coming eyesore by any means necessary. To say they are impassioned territorial protectionists is no stretch.
As one nearby resident bluntly puts it in this May 6 letter-to-the-editor:
The visual image of Cape Wind’s 130, 440-foot proposed wind turbines over 24 square miles of Nantucket Sound offends me. And my right to Nantucket Sound aesthetic value is assured under the National Environmental Policy Act.
There should be no room for such localized NIMBYism in well-conceived renewable energy development. Keep in mind, the Cape Wind plan has statewide polling support of 86 percent.
The U.S. Interior’s Minerals Management Service is preparing to make its final decision on Cape Wind. The project must also secure approvals from the Federal Aviation Administration and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
If the approvals roll in, construction may start as early as 2010, though you can bet lawsuits will spring up like mushrooms to delay the mandate.
What’s clear is that America’s first offshore wind farm will actually get built under Obama’s watch. Whether it will be off Nantucket Sound, as the Cape Wind brand has long claimed and the Massachusetts government now wants, is still unknown.
Delaware or New Jersey may end up beating the Bay State to it.
See also:
America’s First Offshore Wind Farm Coming to Delaware, Finally
China Beats US to Offshore Wind Development
Chevron Relying on Wind Power to Run Offshore Oil Rigs
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
