The EPA has another Bush-era bugaboo in its sights: the so-far-ignored U.S. Supreme Court requirement that the federal government make an official determination under the Clean Air Act that greenhouse gases from motor vehicles are endangering the public health and welfare.
As we mentioned in the previous post, the attorneys general of 18 states sent a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson yesterday asking her to act quickly and decisively on the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Jackson has not formally responded to the letter, but her office gave us this statement:
EPA is confident that people will be satisfied by how quickly and carefully the agency addresses this matter.
That goes way beyond the standard government response of “the agency will look into the matter.”
Last fall, then-candidate Barack Obama’s energy adviser, Jason Grumet, said in an interview with Bloomberg news that Obama, if elected president, would classify carbon dioxide as a dangerous pollutant that can be regulated. Grumet also said Obama would tell the EPA it may use the Clean Air Act to set emissions limits on power plants and manufacturers.
Today’s actions show that President Obama’s administration, just 17 days old, is already making good on those promises. And the EPA’s statement about the request from the attorneys general indicates more positive action is on the way.
Read this morning’s post, EPA Begins Untangling Bush Policies, for more background on the Supreme Court ruling that was snubbed by the Bush administration and on the request from the 18 attorneys general.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
