EPA Extends Deadline for Reporting GHG Emissions

The Obama administration will delay a deadline requiring polluters to report their greenhouse gases from March 31 to later this summer

Share This Article

Factories and bridge over a river
Image: ElitePete

Share This Article

The Environmental Protection Agency said on Tuesday it was extending the deadline requiring thousands of businesses to report their greenhouse gas emissions.

The agency said it was moving the deadline from March 31 to later this summer, when it will have a user-friendly online electronic platform in place for companies to report their emissions. The EPA said it will provide more details on the changes in its Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program in coming weeks.

The reporting program was launched in 2009 to collect information on greenhouse gas pollution to inform future policy decisions.

The trade group that represents oil refiners, which will have to report their emissions, said the delay would result in an accurate greenhouse gas database.

“Taking a little extra time to get this program right makes more sense than rushing to meet an artificial and inflexible deadline,” said Charles Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association. “We recognize the need for a quality reporting program.”

The American Chemistry Council also welcomed the delay. “Reporting done right requires a thorough understanding of the new rules, ample time for feedback and sufficient testing to ensure a high quality database,” Cal Dooley, the president and CEO of the council said in a release.

The reporting program is one aspect of the EPA’s plan to roll out more regulations on emissions of gases blamed for warming the planet.

Some polluters oppose the EPA’s regulations on greenhouse gas emissions saying that they will hurt jobs and the economy. They are pressuring Congress to temporarily delay or stop the agency from regulating the pollution.

Others, such as NRG Energy Inc., one of the country’s biggest electricity generators, want the agency to continue regulating so they can have more certainty about investing in new power generation capacity.

(Reporting by Tom Doggett and Timothy Gardner; editing by Sofina Mirza-Reid)

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Share This Article