After more than a year of public hearings, stakeholder meetings and an unsuccessful pre-emptive court challenge, the Environmental Protection Agency released the final version of the Clean Power Plan this week. The regulations seek to curb carbon pollution from power plants by 32 percent by 2030 and are among the country’s most aggressive efforts to curb climate change.
The rules attracted more than 4.3 million comments to the EPA, the most in the agency’s history. Reactions were mixed. Public health advocates, clean energy businesses, faith-based groups and environmental groups applauded the rules as a step in the right direction to tackle climate change. Politicians from coal country, some utilities and the coal industry, however, decried the rule, saying it was illegal and would cost thousands of jobs.
These groups proposed changes to the regulations on several fronts—including the timeline for compliance, how state targets were calculated and what assumptions could be made about future electricity generation.
Not everyone agreed on the the changes. Even within the environmental groups, there were differences in opinion about the technical details of the plan. The same is true of the coal interests.
The power sector was divided over the changes they wanted to see in the final rule. Those that already transitioned to natural gas-fired plants and have a significant capacity in hydroelectric power and renewables were generally supportive of the plan. Others still dependent on coal mostly opposed it.
The graphic below breaks down the special interest groups into two broad categories—those that were largely supportive of the plan and those that weren’t. Here’s what each side wanted and what they ultimately got.
The final version of the Clean Power Plan significantly changes how state targets are calculated. It eliminates assumptions related to energy efficiency and rejiggers the other assumptions. Here’s a breakdown of how the EPA’s algorithm to calculate state goals has changed.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
