UPDATE (December 12): The deposition of Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey by lawyers for ExxonMobil has been canceled. The Texas federal court judge who approved the deposition voided it without explanation Monday in a one-sentence order.
Dec. 9—Without waiting for a ruling by a federal judge in Texas who has consistently sided with ExxonMobil, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey has filed an appeal to block her deposition scheduled for Tuesday.
Healey explained in a motion filed Thursday with the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that a stay is warranted because the judge who issued the deposition order has refused to properly consider her arguments and has not ruled on her pending motion to stay her deposition.
That judge, U. S. District Judge Ed Kinkeade, had earlier sided with Exxon in its request to depose Healey. He said he suspected the attorney general’s climate fraud investigation of the company may be biased.
“That action is completely without precedent, turns basic law enforcement practice on its head, and constitutes a clear abuse of discretion,” according to Healey’s motion.
A spokesman for Exxon did not respond to a request for comment.
Exxon had gone to court in June seeking an injunction to halt Healey’s investigation and asked that a judge rule the investigation was without legal merit.
Healey’s office had issued a civil investigative demand—similar to a subpoena—for Exxon records going back 40 years as part of her investigation of whether the company committed consumer or securities fraud by misrepresenting its knowledge of climate change.
At the same time Healey appealed the deposition order, she also filed an appeal to toss out Exxon’s entire case that seeks to block her investigation.
A key component to Exxon’s case rests on its assertion that Healey cannot conduct an impartial investigation.
“Requiring the Attorney General to explain her investigatory rationale at this stage would make a shambles of the investigation and stifle her gathering of facts,” according to the motion to dismiss the case.
“The only likely outcome of the discovery that the court has ordered is an improper and vexatious investigation into privileged or protected information.”
Exxon also has filed a lawsuit in Texas to block an investigation by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, saying his investigation is politically motivated.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,