House Republicans’ Group Launches Effort to Tackle Climate Change

By framing the issue with economic imperatives, 17 Republicans urge the House to move beyond denial toward solutions.

Share This Article

A group of 17 Republicans in the House, led by Rep. Elise Stefanik from New York, left, passed a resolution to address climate issues.
A group of 17 Republicans in the House, led by Rep. Elise Stefanik from New York, left, passed a resolution to address climate issues. Credit: Getty Images/Mark Wilson

Share This Article

A group of 17 House Republicans introduced a resolution on Wednesday that calls for the House to commit to working on climate change solutions that keep in mind the health of the economy.

The resolution makes the argument that it is a conservative principle to “protect, conserve and be good stewards of the environment, responsibility plan for all market factors, and base our policy decisions in science and quantifiable fact.”

Though it stops short of recognizing the connection between emissions from fossil fuels and climate change, it is a departure from the outright climate denial promoted by many Republican congressmen and Trump administration appointees.

Former Rep. Bob Inglis, a Republican from South Carolina, who has embraced the science of climate change and who advocated for a carbon tax while in office, called the resolution “really exciting.” In particular, he found the involvement of Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) to be a promising sign.

“Mark is a true fiscal conservative who understands markets and is unassailably conservative,” Inglis said. Having Sanford as a part of the effort—which is led by Reps. Carlos Curbelo (Fla.), Elise Stefanik (N.Y.) and Ryan Costello (Penn.)—is an important stamp of approval, Inglis said.

Inglis said the resolution does a good job of framing the threat of climate change as an opportunity for “American ingenuity, innovation, and exceptionalism”—something that could allow those who previously denied climate change to come into the fold.

“If you tell me the apocalypse is upon me I will shrink in science denial because it’s a pretty good coping mechanism,” Inglis said. “But if you start the conversation with, ‘There are ways to be ingenious here and ways that Americans can lead,’ now I’m feeling efficacious. Engagement is now my coping mechanism.”

That the resolution doesn’t acknowledge fossil fuel emissions as the driver of climate change did not come as a surprise to Inglis.

“These leaders are trying to shape public opinion and lead public opinion, and that is best done gently,” Inglis said. “We don’t think many people are going to have the ability to do a 180 on this.”

The move garnered applause from various environmental groups.

“It is good to see more Republican Members of Congress acknowledging the science of climate change,” Alex Taurel, the deputy legislative director of the League of Conservation Voters said in a press release.

“I’m heartened to see Republican House members introduce a resolution committing Congress to address climate change and base its policy decisions on science and quantifiable facts,” Ken Kimmell, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a press release.

“If Congress followed the science it would, of course, see that fossil fuel emissions are driving climate change,” Kimmel said in his statement. “While the resolution doesn’t explicitly make this link, it shows that these Republican lawmakers are not in a state of denial about this key issue.”

Curbelo has led the effort to bring Republicans into the climate conversation. He co-founded the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus in 2016, a House group that aims to address the impacts, causes and challenges of climate change. The membership is deliberately kept evenly split between Democrats and Republicans. Currently, there are 15 members from each party.

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Share This Article