As the Trump administration’s trade war heats up, a group of experts is proposing a new way to counter protectionism—and prod the United States back into climate action at the same time.
In a commentary in the journal Nature, the team of trade and climate policy experts called for a global punitive tax on imports based on their carbon footprint.
It’s an idea that was invented to address the problem of “free riders”—nations that refuse to join the global practice of putting a price on carbon, such as a tax or a cap-and-trade market mechanism. To avoid giving the free riders a competitive advantage in world trade, the carbon price would be collected on their products as an import tariff at the border.
The border tax would “level the emissions playing field by imposing the same economic burden on domestic and external manufacturers,” the team writes in the article, published online Monday.
As the Trump administration upends trade relationships with allies while renouncing the Paris climate agreement, the authors contend that this kind of a tax could be more appealing than ever.
“It’s politically seductive for policymakers,” said Michael Mehling, an MIT climate and trade expert and lead author of the commentary.
Carbon-based tariffs—known as border carbon adjustments, or BCAs—used to be easy to dismiss out of fear that it would upend the delicate balances of international trade, Mehling said.
Now, Mehling says, the tit-for-tat tariffs slapped by the U.S. on China as well as on close allies, and vice versa, presents a whole new ballgame.
“The relationship is soured,” he said. “Now you’re thinking about how best to hit back.”
Who’s Actually Considering It?
Just last year, French President Emmanuel Macron called BCAs “indispensable.” In Canada, Environment Minister Catherine McKenna has said they warrant a closer look. Mexico mentions them in their commitments under the Paris Agreement.
Democratic lawmakers in the United States added language calling for BCAs into a series of climate bills through the early 2000s. They almost succeeded when the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill passed the House in 2009, but it died in the Senate.
Internationally, the idea worried developing nations, Mehling said, as it could hold back their emerging economies. But in the years since, those countries—many of which are feeling the immediate impacts of climate change—have stepped up their climate commitments while seeing others, like the U.S., walk theirs back. “The chess pieces have literally changed sides,” Mehling said.
Making BCAs Work Isn’t Simple
Though the authors argue that now is a “perfect opportunity” to implement a BCA, actually pulling it off would be complicated.
“You don’t know how politically feasible this is already,” said Harvard economist Martin Weitzman. “Now you’re somehow marrying this idea of border carbon adjustments on top of highly uncertain Trump tariffs? It seems like a poison mix somehow.”
Putting those complicated relationships aside, Weitzman also pointed to the challenges around implementing this kind of tax.
“If you take something like steel, there are many different ways to make steel, and they have quite different carbon footprints,” he said. “It isn’t clear how to actually make this calculation of what the carbon tax should be.”
Mehling said despite the concerns of some about rocking the boat by introducing BCAs, there’s a good argument that they might help tackle the two sticky issues of the trade war and climate laggards at once.
“It’s not going to go away,” he said. “If anything, now is a unique confluence of things that makes it a good a time as any.”
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
Sabrina Shankman
Reporter, Maine
Sabrina Shankman is a reporter for InsideClimate News focusing on the Arctic. She joined InsideClimate in the fall of 2013, after helping produce documentaries and interactives for the PBS show “Frontline” since 2010 with 2over10 Media. She worked as a co-producer, field producer or associate producer on the Frontline films League of Denial (2013); Money, Power and Wall Street (2012); A Perfect Terrorist (2011); Dr. Hotspots (2011) and Law and Disorder (2010). In 2012, she produced the online interactive A Perfect Terrorist: David Coleman Headley’s Web of Betrayal, which won an Overseas Press Club of America award. She is the author of Meltdown: Terror at the Top of the World. She has also reported for ProPublica, the Wall Street Journal and the Associated Press. Her work has been honored by the Society of Professional Journalists and the Society of Environmental Journalists, and she was named a finalist for the Livingston Awards for Young Journalists in 2010 and again in 2015. Shankman has a Masters in Journalism from UC Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism.
