The EPA’s New ‘Technical Assistance Centers’ Are a Big Deal for Environmental Justice. Here’s Why

Federal funding for environmental justice is at a historic high, but tapping it means navigating complex grant applications. New community-focused training centers aim to help.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan testifies before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee regarding 2024 budget proposals on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C, on March 22, 2023. Credit: Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan testifies before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee regarding 2024 budget proposals on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C, on March 22, 2023. Credit: Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

Share this article

Maria Lopez-Nunez knows all too well how difficult obtaining a federal grant can be.

Some grant applications run upwards of 100 pages long and are riddled with obscure jargon. Applicants are often required to provide detailed data that can only be acquired by conducting a study or survey. And federal agencies, according to Lopez-Nunez, often prioritize applicants who previously received government grants, giving a leg up to legacy institutions that already have ample resources and frequently get an outsized amount of funding from the government and philanthropies. 

“So often (federal grants) end up in the hands of universities that might not be directly working with our communities, or big mainstream organizations that only end up giving crumbs to the environmental justice communities that they’re partnering with,” Lopez-Nunez, a veteran activist and deputy director of organizing and advocacy at the environmental justice nonprofit Ironbound Community Corporation, said in an interview.

That’s why she was excited that the Biden administration is doing something to help smaller grassroots groups like hers better navigate the complexities of the federal grant making process.

Last week, the Environmental Protection Agency announced that it is spending $177 million to create 17 technical assistance centers around the country. Those centers aim to help community organizations apply for environmental justice funding made available under both the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act. 

The IRA, which passed last year, dedicates some $60 billion in federal spending to advance efforts to reduce the nation’s persistent health and economic disparities—though some estimates place that number closer to $47 billion. President Joe Biden’s Justice40 initiative also directs federal agencies to deliver 40 percent of the “overall benefits” of their environmental and energy investments to disadvantaged communities, including from federal infrastructure funds. It’s a historic amount of money, but activists worry it could fail to reach the most vulnerable communities without better training on how to access it.

“We know that so many communities across the nation have the solutions to the environmental challenges they face. Unfortunately, many have lacked access or faced barriers when it comes to the crucial federal resources needed to deliver these solutions,” EPA Administrator Michael Regan said in a press release announcing the new centers last week. “Today we’re taking another step to break down these barriers.”

The $177 million from the EPA will be split between 17 universities and environmental nonprofits, including the University of Minnesota, New Mexico State University, Deep South Center for Environmental Justice and West Harlem Environmental Action (more commonly known as WE ACT for Environmental Justice). Each group will partner with the Department of Energy and receive at least $10 million to build their capacity as training centers.

Chris Dobens, the communications director for WE ACT, said his organization will use its funding to raise awareness of federal grant opportunities and provide technical assistance for community groups on things like grant writing, fundraising and conducting research. “The goal is to help these groups identify environmental and climate justice opportunities in their own communities and successfully secure funding to realize them,” he said in an email.

Lopez-Nunez, who also sits on the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council, said grassroots organizations need that kind of help to compete with bigger, better-resourced institutions for funding. Just last year, her organization applied for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s environmental literacy grant for the third time, only to get rejected during the final rounds of the selection process. “I never got it. I’ve been in the 99th percentile three times,” she said. “And we’ve been around for 54 years. It’s not like we’re a new grassroots group that just started.”

Lopez-Nunez said she also hopes the training centers can help close the funding gaps faced by nonprofits led by women and people of color—an issue she says exists among all funding sources. For example, one survey found that 75 percent of Black-led organizations received funding from foundations in 2021, compared to 86 percent of white-led groups. Another report found that between 70 to 80 percent of philanthropic funding goes to organizations run by men, even though climate justice work is now largely led by women of color.

The new centers could also free up some capacity for environmental justice organizations, many of which now face double the workload as they continue to fight projects and policies that they believe will harm their communities, while also applying for the massive amount of federal funding now available to them.

It’s a situation that Robert Bullard, a prominent environmental justice activist and a member of the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council, has called both a blessing and a serious challenge. “We’re talking about a substantial amount of money that’s never been earmarked or devoted to justice issues,” Bullard told me in an interview earlier this year. “The challenge is not to let this opportunity pass us up because we may never get it again.”

More Top Climate News

Biden Administration Approves Alaska Natural Gas Exports, Drawing Progressive Ire: The Biden administration on Thursday greenlit natural gas exports from a facility in Alaska, drawing ire from environmentalists who say the decision, along with the approval of another major Alaska oil drilling project last month, jeopardize efforts to slow climate change, Rachel Frazin reports for The Hill. “The recent choices of this administration have been reckless,” New York Rep. Jamaal Bowman, a Democrat, wrote in a tweet. “Our kids deserve a livable future and you are throwing it away.”

Utah’s Great Salt Lake Was At Risk Of Disappearing. Unprecedented Weather Is Bringing It Back: Only months ago, scientists reported record low water levels in Utah’s Great Salt Lake and warned that the ongoing regional megadrought had put the iconic lake at risk of disappearing in a matter of years, MacKenzie Ryan reports for the Guardian. But following a series of recent unprecedented weather events, including historic winter snowfall, the lake’s water levels are now rising. It’s a brief victory, however. Scientists say it will take far more precipitation to alleviate the drought.

The ‘Ninjas’ Fighting Climate Change Denial on Twitter: A group of 25 secretive internet vigilantes have made it their mission to fight climate change denial on Twitter, fact-checking conspiracy theories that go viral and reporting accounts that regularly share misleading and false claims about global warming whenever they violate the platform’s user agreement rules. But in their efforts to get climate deniers banned from Twitter, Marco Silva writes in his story for BBC News, are the vigilantes at risk of becoming trolls themselves?

Today’s Indicator


That’s the percentage of North American bat species that “are at risk of severe population decline” in the next 15 years due to climate change, disease and habitat loss, scientists warned in the latest “State of the Bats” annual report.