Climate Change Lands on Agenda of the PTA

California PTA adopts resolution on teaching climate science, but its passage nationwide and its impact beyond the state are uncertain.

Paul Richman, executive director of the California State PTA. The organization, which represents nearly 1 million parents and educators, has adopted a resolution to urge schools to make climate change a priority. Credit: California State PTA

Share this article

School districts in California—and perhaps nationwide—will soon feel increased pressure from parents to teach climate science in their classrooms.

The California State Parent Teacher Association, which represents nearly 1 million parents and educators, adopted a resolution this month to urge schools to prioritize climate curriculum and improve energy efficiency, as well as to lobby lawmakers to act on climate warming.

The group plans to bring the resolution to the National Parent Teacher Association for adoption as early as next year. If that were to happen, it would mean that millions of parents in school districts across the country would be pushing for improved climate education and legislation at a time when both face serious opposition from conservative groups.

“People tend to blow off the PTA,” said Minda Berbeco, programs and policy director at the National Center for Science Education, an Oakland, Calif., not-for-profit group that works to protect evolution and climate science in schools. “But if the PTA supports something, it is hard for politicians and community leaders to go against it. It would mean going against the wishes of the majority of the parents in their state or district.”

The resolution frames the issue of climate change as a significant threat to children.

“There is broad scientific consensus among climate scientists that human activities contributing to greenhouse gases are the dominant cause of climate warming since 1950,” the document reads. “Children represent a particularly vulnerable group already suffering disproportionately from both direct and indirect adverse health effects of climate change.” 

Like evolution before it, climate change has become a highly controversial education issue in recent years. Conservative groups like the Heartland Institute have launched campaigns aimed at educators and textbook publishers to promote doubt about the scientific consensus on manmade global warming.

In 2013, the National Research Council and National Science Teachers Association, among other groups, released the Next Generation Science Standards for grades K-12. The standards are the science equivalent of the Common Core for math and English. They recommend that educators teach global warming as early as elementary school and incorporate it into all science classes, ranging from earth science to chemistry. 

But despite being co-written by 26 state boards of education, only 13 states have formally adopted the standards. By contrast, 46 states and the District of Columbia have adopted the Common Core. The Next Generation Science Standards have faced significant challenges in places such as Utah, Iowa, Michigan and South Dakota.

California has adopted the Next Generation Science Standards, so teachers are already preparing to incorporate climate science into their curricula. The California PTA will likely keep pressure on them to make sure that happens, and offer teachers its support, especially in the deep red pockets of the state. Otherwise, the organization will largely focus on the parts of the resolution that call for schools to be energy efficient and sustainable, and for legislators to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

“Parents have an incredible amount of clout, of sway over their districts,” said Leah Qusba, a spokeswoman for the Alliance for Climate Education, an Oakland, Calif.-based not-for-profit organization that works to strengthen climate science education in high schools nationally. “If you look at some of places where boards of education have been on the fence about adopting [the Next Generation Science Standards], but ultimately decided to, the big change was when parents stepped up in support.”

National Challenges

Often stereotyped as being simply the organizer of bake sales and proms, the PTA has a 100-plus year history of affecting change in America’s classrooms and for children’s rights. Founded in 1897, the group has been a driving force behind child labor laws, mandatory immunizations, anti-drug education, and public health campaigns ranging from awareness of sexually transmitted diseases to testing students for scoliosis. The organization has branches in nearly every major school district in the country and is headquartered in Alexandria, Va., right next door to Washington, D.C.

The California PTA hopes to introduce the resolution at the organization’s 2016 national convention, giving it a full year to gain support from delegates in other states. Its passage is by no means a sure thing, education experts said. With the 2016 presidential election in full gear, climate change will likely be an extremely partisan issue, and the National PTA is composed of members from all 50 states and both sides of the aisle.

Even if it is adopted, there is bound to be some resistance. PTA resolutions aren’t law. Rather they guide the organization’s agenda and position statements. It would be easy for communities to ignore the resolution. Texas, for example, has a long history of rebuffing national education standards, and political and public understanding and acceptance of climate change risks is low in the state.

In addition, the National PTA’s membership numbers have dropped significantly in recent decades. The group doesn’t have the influence it once did, said William Cutler, an education historian at Temple University and author of the book “Parents and Schools: The 150-Year Struggle for Control in American Education.”

Environmental education leaders argue, however, that even if a portion of the PTA’s 4 million members follow the resolution it could send a strong message to thousands of schools to “wake up” on the issue of climate change, said Derby Pattengill, president of the San Diego Unified Council of PTAs, which crafted the climate resolution. The group represents 89 schools K-12.

Cutler is less optimistic.

“It is out of character for most PTAs to go to schools and tell them what to teach,” said Cutler, who served on his local PTA when his children were young. “Parents seldom weigh in on teachers’ curriculum because most don’t feel qualified to make those decisions.”

A Two-Year Effort

The California resolution was first proposed by a group of San Diego parents in 2014, but the state told them it needed more scientific evidence to back up the claims that human activities are driving modern climate change, and that children will be particularly at risk from global warming impacts.

Working with the National Center for Science Education, the group rewrote the resolution, using more up-to-date scientific literature, and resubmitted it for consideration this year. The California State PTA debated the resolution on May 2 at its annual convention in Sacramento. Delegates voiced concerns that the organization would be taking on a scientific agenda, and they contended that climate change isn’t really a children’s issue. In the end, however, the majority of the more than 1,000 delegates at the convention voted “yes” to adopting it.

“When I’ve spoken to thought leaders about how we build a family-and-parent movement in support of climate action, PTAs have always come up as a logical place to go,” said Lisa Hoyos, co-founder of the advocacy group Climate Parents. “But it is one thing to have a resolution on paper and another to make sure it is implemented. That’s the next step.”