After Criticism, Gas Industry Official Withdraws as Candidate for Maryland’s Public Service Commission

The office of Gov. Wes Moore, who nominated the controversial candidate this month, says it respects the decision and that its nominees will be aligned with the administration’s ambitious climate goals.

Share This Article

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore speaks on stage on stage during an event at the Fine and Performing Arts Center at Bowie State University on Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2023 in Bowie, Maryland. Credit: Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore speaks on stage during an event at the Fine and Performing Arts Center at Bowie State University on Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2023 in Bowie, Maryland. Credit: Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Share This Article

A gas industry executive nominated by Gov. Wes Moore to serve on the Maryland Public Service Commission withdrew his candidacy on Tuesday after environmentalists questioned his commitment to fighting climate change and protecting ratepayers’ interests while regulating gas and electric utilities.

Juan Alvarado, the senior director of energy analysis at the American Gas Association—the biggest lobbying group representing the gas industry—said in a statement that he was withdrawing his candidacy for “personal reasons.” But his nomination to the commission by Moore on Feb. 17 had raised hackles, given the new governor’s pledges to shift the state from a reliance on fossil fuels to a full embrace of clean energy. 

In a statement released by Moore’s office, Alvarado said, “I firmly believe in Governor Moore’s leadership and vision, and know he will continue moving Maryland towards meeting its vital climate goals.” 

An economist by training, Alvarado previously worked at the Public Service Commission in various roles for over a decade, directing the agency’s economic research as well as its telecommunications, gas and water division. Since 2020, he has worked at the American Gas Association and is currently its senior director for energy analysis.

Newsletters

We deliver climate news to your inbox like nobody else. Every day or once a week, our original stories and digest of the web’s top headlines deliver the full story, for free.

Moore, a Democrat who took over as governor last month, said he respected Alvarado’s decision to withdraw from the confirmation process. “Juan shares our conviction that addressing climate change is the defining challenge of our time, and his deep understanding of the Public Service Commission was knowledge that would have served Maryland well,” he said in a statement.

“Our nominees to the Public Service Commission will be aligned with our administration’s goals,” the governor added. “We will work in partnership throughout this confirmation process to move Maryland forward.” A spokesperson for Moore said Alvarado’s replacement would be announced in the “near future.” 

The PSC’s five commissioners, appointed by the governor, serve staggered terms and must be approved by the Maryland Senate. 

After taking office, Moore had withdrawn 48 of the recess appointments submitted to the state Senate last July by his Republican predecessor, Larry Hogan, clearing the way for three new PSC appointees. In announcing that he had selected Alvarado on Feb. 17, the governor also nominated Frederick Hoover, currently with the state watchdog agency known as the Office of the People’s Counsel, to head the commission. The third nomination has yet to be submitted by Moore’s office.

Alvarado’s appointment stirred consternation among environmentalists, who had assumed that Moore’s picks would be sympathetic to goals set in the state’s new climate law. In legislation  approved last spring, Maryland has set a target of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 60 percent from 2006 levels by 2031 and achieving net-zero emissions by 2045.

The news of Alvarado’s withdrawal drew cautious expressions of support from environmental groups. 

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

Kim Coble, executive director of the nonprofit League of Conservation Voters, said her group was focusing on ensuring that “we get strong appointments to that PSC so it can advance the clean energy targets.” She said she was confident that the administration would nominate strong candidates going forward. “We look forward to working with the Moore administration to ensure strong appointments are made at the PSC,” she said.

Emily Scarr, director of the consumer rights group Maryland PIRG, said that Moore’s nominees should be aligned with the administration’s goals. “Marylanders should have full faith that commissioners will fulfill the agency’s mission to serve the public interest, fight for ratepayers, ensure public safety and protect the environment,” she said.

Josh Tulkin, director of the Sierra Club’s Maryland chapter, said his group looked forward to working with Moore and the governor’s secretary of appointments, Tisha Edwards, “to ensure the PSC is ready to advance the governor’s bold climate agenda.” Tulkin had argued earlier that Alvarado was the wrong candidate for the job and that his nomination to the commission could jeopardize the governor’s promise to combat climate change. 

Environmental advocates have pushed the Moore administration to expedite the appointment of new members to the Public Service Commission. Only last year, the five-member commission was citing the views of climate change deniers, and it is still composed entirely of commissioners appointed by Hogan.

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Share This Article