facebook twitter subscribe

Donate to SolveClimate News

Nebraska Landowners Still Worried About Keystone XL Pipeline Route

The map that state regulators are using to define the Nebraska Sandhills is flawed, landowners tell the governor in a private meeting.

Feb 6, 2012
Nebraska Sandhills

The Keystone XL oil pipeline may have stalled for now, but a group of Nebraskans is worried that the project—which will likely be resurrected in some form—would still pass through regions of the state that are vulnerable to oil spills.

Seven landowners met with Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman on Thursday to discuss their concerns. They brought along a slideshow of maps and photos and signed their presentation "by Stewards of the Land."

The pipeline was originally slated to pass through the Sandhills, a fragile ecosystem that overlies the Ogallala aquifer in north-central Nebraska. But last November, TransCanada, the Alberta-based company that is trying to build the project, bowed to pressure and agreed to reroute the pipeline away from the Sandhills. The company had begun searching for a new route when the Obama administration rejected the pipeline permit on Jan. 18.

What worries the ranchers is the map that Nebraska's Department of Environmental Quality, or DEQ, is using to define the edges of the Sandhills. The map marks off the land TransCanada must avoid, but the landowners say it should also include nearby areas with sandy soil and a high water table—the same characteristics that make the Sandhills so vulnerable.

There are places where "you could [walk] down the line [defining] the Sandhills and you wouldn't see the difference" between the land on either side, said Terry Frisch, one of the ranchers who met with Heineman last week.

The landowners showed the governor the results of soil samples they sent to a laboratory in Omaha. They said the tests show little difference between the soil inside and outside the boundaries shown on the map.

"We've been called radical environmentalists," Frisch said, "but we're just looking out for our livelihood."

Frisch's land lies 12 miles from the original pipeline path. Even though he doesn't expect to be directly impacted by the reroute, he said a spill in the aquifer would affect farms and ranches for miles around. "If we've got to have this pipeline, then it needs to be placed in clay-based soils where the aquifer cannot be contaminated." He wants the route moved to eastern Nebraska, where the groundwater lies deeper underground.

Amy Schaffer, a fifth-generation Nebraskan whose father runs a Sandhills ranch, said she wants the DEQ to redraw the map to include more of the Sandhills.

Heineman's office didn't return requests for comment about Thursday's meeting. Schaffer said the governor gave them 90 minutes of his time, an hour longer than originally planned.

"I think the governor was receptive to [our point of view]…but he made no promises," she said. "He encouraged us to speak with the DEQ, with Speaker [of the legislature] Mike Flood and to the press."

Schaffer said they had an impromptu meeting with Flood after they left the governor's office. Flood also listened to their concerns, she said, but, like Heineman, he made no promises.

Both Schaffer and Frisch said the group has had less success with the DEQ. "We all tried to get into the DEQ office in December," Schaffer said, but "they would not meet with us until after they'd decided on the Sandhills map" in January.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <ul> <li> <ol> <b> <i> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options