Pulitzer winning climate news.
facebook twitter subscribe
view counter

EagleFordProjectPreviewBlock

BloombergLegacyPreviewBlock

BusinessDeveloperAd



CleanBreakAdAmazon

Donate to InsideClimate News through our secure page on Network for Good.

Workers at San Onofre Nuclear Plant Report Culture of Fear, Deep Mistrust

Edison, the utility that runs San Onofre, is in upheaval as it digests new evidence that many of its employees are working in an environment of fear.

Oct 4, 2012
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

Story updated at 3 p.m. EDT, Oct. 4, 2012

The utility that runs California's troubled San Onofre nuclear plant is in the midst of unprecedented upheaval as it works to rein in bloated management, address ethics issues and digest new evidence that many of its employees work in a "pressure-cooker" environment marked by overwork, distrust and fear of retaliation, according to documents obtained by InsideClimate News.

The internal documents—one report, one companywide survey and a series of management e-mails—reveal that in the last few months, electric utility Southern California Edison has quietly begun a restructuring that has thus far included the ouster or retirement of several top executives, the consolidation of ethics investigations within SCE's corporate parent and the reorganization of several departments.

In addition to the unpublicized shakeup, the company recently announced it would reorganize management at its idled San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) and cut more than 700 jobs, or about a third of the plant's payroll. And last week, Edison told employees it would also trim 20 percent of the managers in the utility's Information Technology group.   

The big changes at Edison, which operates SONGS and is its majority owner, come at a critical juncture in an ongoing debate about the safety, cost and necessity of restarting the nuclear plant's two reactors. SONGS has been shut down since February because of fears that excessive wear inside its steam generators could trigger a radioactive leak.

Today, Edison is expected to submit a report to federal regulators describing the cause of the equipment problems and possibly proposing a plan for restarting one of the plant's reactors.

(Editor's note: On Oct. 4, Edison filed documents with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission outlining its conclusions about the cause of SONGS' steam generator problems and proposing to restart one of the plant's reactors, run it at 70 percent of capacity, then inspect it after five months. The NRC said it expects to spend several months analyzing Edison's filing. The commission will host a public meeting in Southern California Oct. 9 to discuss SONGS developments.)

The fate of SONGS is a contentious issue for nearby cities as well as for the more than eight million residents who live within a 50-mile radius of the coastal plant. But it's also one of the focal points in a national debate over the merits of nuclear energy—a debate that has grown more intense since Japan's Fukushima nuclear accident, throwing into doubt a widely expected renaissance in U.S. nuclear power.  

According to the company's most recent employee ethics and compliance survey, summarized in a June 2012 presentation obtained by InsideClimate News, only 39 percent of the utility's workers agreed that Edison rewards people who follow its ethics and compliance standards. Only 54 percent said they could question management decisions without fear of retaliation. And 38 percent said Edison does not reward questionable actions, compared to 61 percent in a 2007 national survey that asked a similar question.

Karlene Roberts, an expert in workplace culture within high-risk industries and a professor at University of California Berkeley's Haas business school, said this about those survey results: "Those numbers are bad ... that company's in trouble."

Information in the workplace culture report and a companywide ethics survey also suggests that employees throughout the utility—including at SONGS—distrust their managers and fear retaliation if they raise ethical concerns or report misconduct.

The 23-page workplace culture report, dated May 15, was highly critical of the "unhealthy" and stress-filled work environment in the utility’s Information Technology and Business Integration organization, where two supervisors were killed and two others were wounded in a December 2011 shooting attack by an employee who killed himself afterward.

Experts from Incident Management Team, an independent workplace consultant, interviewed employees throughout Edison's Information Technology organization, including workers based at SONGS, the Irwindale facility where the shooting occurred and several other locations. The IT department employs more than 1,800 employees—roughly 10 percent of SCE's total payroll at the end of 2011.

The consultants concluded that Edison's IT organization suffered from a "fundamental lack of leadership in many areas" that led to "loss of trust, lack of respect, fear of retaliation, inefficient decision-making processes, poor communication, lack of work/life balance, abusive management styles, lack of management accountability, perceived absence of fairness and a shortage of recognition."

Roberts, a workplace culture expert, said the litany of woes cited by the Edison consultants is typical in situations where the review takes place after a catastrophe.

"That's pretty standard," Roberts said. "It's standard because those are the things that go wrong."

AttachmentSize
WorkerComplaintsatSONGSComparedtoOtherPlantsINSIDECLIMATENEWS.jpg143.51 KB
SafetyComplaintsfromWorkersU.S.NuclearPlantsINSIDECLIMATENEWS.jpg72.44 KB
Comment space is provided for respectful discourse. Please consult our comment policies for more information. We welcome your participation in civil and constructive discussions.