An independent panel of jurists, scientists and other environmental experts will gather facts starting Friday related to a controversial railroad project in Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula that is said to impact sensitive ecosystems, ancient historical sites and the rights of Indigenous and other local communities.
The Tren Maya, a rail system that will traverse over 900 miles in the Yucatan, including the tourist hotspots Cancun and Tulum, is one of several large-scale projects championed by Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador that has been exempted from otherwise required environmental impact assessments.
The train will be used by tourists to travel between resorts along the coast and historical sites, including ancient Mayan ruins. López Obrador has touted the project, which is projected to cost upwards of $8 billion, as a means to bring economic development to impoverished parts of the country.
Critics of the project, which is slated for completion in December 2023, say the train will cause long-term, and in some cases irreversible damage, to forests, aquifers, and a complex system of underground rivers and caves, which could collapse under the weight of the railway.
Activists have also derided the lack of consultation with those communities and say the project will harm the same peoples the development is intended to spotlight: Indigenous Mayan descendants. In some places the train slices through communities, creating safety and logistical concerns: residents who largely commute on foot will need to travel long distances to crossing points to get to destinations on the other side of the tracks.
The independent panel, called the International Rights of Nature Tribunal, was created to promote a legal movement based on the premise that nature—forests and rivers and wild animals and ecosystems—has inherent legal rights to exist and regenerate, just as humans possess human rights by virtue of their existence.
The panel will begin its three-day visit on Friday with visits to the Pisté, Xmaben and Tihosuco communities. A group of five tribunal will tour train construction sites, visit with community rights organizations and take testimony from affected communities in the states of Yucatan, Quintana Roo and Campeche.
Modeled on the International War Crimes Tribunal and the Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal— citizen organizations for the investigation of human rights violations—the tribunal’s mandate is to investigate alleged rights of nature violations. The tribunal was created to take testimony and evaluate violations of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth, a document adopted during a 2010 people’s conference in Cochabamba, Bolivia. The conference came one year after what rights of nature advocates considered a disappointing U.N. climate summit in Copenhagen.
This story is funded by readers like you.
Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.
Donate NowThe tribunal has heard at least 14 cases across the world since then, including the “Amazon, a threatened living entity” last year in Brazil, “Defenders of Nature and Mother Earth” in 2017 and “False solutions to climate change” in 2021].
Judges presiding over each case are selected by the Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature, based on the location and subject matter of the case. The judges on the Tren Maya tribunal are: Father Raúl Vera (Mexico), Yaku Pérez (Ecuador), Antonio Elizalde (Chile), Francesco Martone (Italy/Ecuador), Maristella Svampa (Argentina) and Alberto Saldamando (United States). Tribunal secretary Natalia Greene (Ecuador) will also participate.
The judges will issue a non-binding report and judgment following the visit that is intended to create a body of model rights of nature jurisprudence as well as provide visibility to the socio-environmental issues related to the Tren Maya project.
Legal challenges to the project in Mexico, including claims that the construction violates the human right to a healthy environment and to be consulted, have so far proved unsuccessful. Last year, López Obrador declared the project a matter of national security, allowing the project to circumvent legal injunctions halting construction.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
