CALGARY, Alberta—Canada moved ahead on Friday with new regulations for cutting emissions from coal-fired power plants as environmental groups decried one project that they said won a speedy approval just in time to avoid the tighter rules.
Environment Minister Peter Kent said the regulations, aimed at gradually phasing out coal-fired power generation as a way to meet the federal government’s greenhouse gas commitments, will force developers to reduce emissions to levels that are comparable to high-efficiency gas-fired plants.
That means new coal-fired plants will have to employ expensive, nascent technology, such as carbon capture and storage.
“We are taking action in the electricity sector because we recognize the potential for significant emissions reductions,” Kent said in a statement. “We are committed to build on our strength in the electricity sector and to lead the world in clean electricity generation.”
The regulations will be published on August 27, which will start a 60-day public comment period. Final rules are scheduled to come into effect on July 1, 2015.
This month, environmental groups launched a court action against Alberta’s utility regulator, arguing it fast-tracked approval of a coal-fired plant proposed by Maxim Power Corp so the company could avoid the new regulations.
In their action, the Pembina Institute and Ecojustice said Maxim had said it received assurances from the federal environment ministry that it could avoid the new rules if the 500 megawatt plant was built before July 1, 2015.
Kent’s department said the new regulations, when combined with other federal and provincial rules, are expected to result in an absolute drop of 31 megatonnes of greenhouse gas emissions from power generation between 2005 and 2020.
The Conservative government has set a goal of cutting Canada’s emissions by 17 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, a less stringent target than Ottawa had earlier committed to under the Kyoto Accord.
That would mean a reduction of 124 megatonnes at a time when production from the country’s oil sands — which emits more carbon dioxide than conventional crude production — is expected to double.
(Reporting by Jeffrey Jones; editing by Rob Wilson)
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
