Utility-scale solar power today is much more efficient than it was a decade ago in how much land it uses, according to new research.
The paper, by lead author Mark Bolinger of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, is timely because utility-scale solar is a big part of plans to make a transition to carbon-free electricity, and because there have been few recent studies about solar’s efficiency in land use.
“It just seems a little bit odd to still be relying on data that was almost a decade out of date,” Bolinger told me.
He found an increase of more than 40 percent in the median generating capacity per acre of solar panels between 2011 and 2019. This includes both “tracking” solar systems, in which the panels shift during the day to follow the sun, and “fixed-tilt” systems, which are stationary. The paper was published in the IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.
To help put this in more understandable terms, a 100-megawatt tracking solar array would have needed about 600 acres in 2011, but would only have needed about 420 acres in 2019, based on median figures.
That’s a huge shift, which means that the massive deployment of utility-scale solar that is likely to happen in the coming decades will need less land than previously thought.
The main reason for the improvement is that solar panels have become much more efficient in the amount of electricity they produce, which, multiplied tens of thousands of times for a whole solar array, leads to big gains. Also, the algorithms that run the tracking systems have gotten better at following the sun.
The paper helps to quantify some regional differences in solar systems. While we already know that a solar array in Southern California can generate more electricity per acre than one in Michigan or Minnesota, the paper adds some nuance by showing that the use of tracking systems is reducing the disadvantage of being in a northern climate.
The paper defines “utility-scale solar” as ground-mounted systems of at least 5 megawatts.
I’ve known Bolinger for years as one of the authors of the Lawrence Berkeley lab’s exhaustive annual reports on utility-scale solar and utility-scale wind.
Through this work, he noticed that solar projects have become much more efficient in recent years. He also saw that researchers were continuing to cite old studies about solar land use that did not reflect the recent gains.
One frequently cited study was written in 2013 by a team at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. While that may seem recent, the solar industry has made several leaps in the years since.
To do his study, Bolinger gathered electricity generation data and satellite images of more than 700 projects.
But he had some help. His co-author was Greta Bolinger, his daughter, who is an undergraduate at Bowdoin College in Maine and now has a publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
“She took a term off and was looking for some things to do,” he said. “She did a lot of the legwork.”
Keep Environmental Journalism Alive
ICN provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going.Donate Now
The paper is touching on a controversial subject, which is that the energy transition is going to need a lot of rural land for wind and solar power. For example, Princeton University’s “Net-Zero America” report has a scenario in which the United States would increase its solar power capacity by about 15-fold by 2050. The U.S. Department of Energy’s “Solar Futures Study” said that solar could account for as much as 45 percent of the country’s electricity supply by 2050, up from the low single digits today.
Rural residents are already concerned that renewable energy is changing the character of the places where they live, and some local governments are putting up obstacles to its development.
Partly in response to those concerns, researchers and environmental advocates are working on so-called “agrivoltaics,” which is an exploration of the ways that land being used for solar arrays can also be used for agriculture.
Bolinger doesn’t expect his paper to make much of a difference in local debates, which have to do with specific proposals rather than big-picture issues. But he does hope that his work will influence other researchers and show the need to keep up with the reality in the market of how much power can be generated on an acre of land.
His main lesson, which is now loud and clear to me, is that estimates of the amount of land needed for solar are a moving target.
Other stories about the energy transition to take note of this week:
Stakes Become Clear In California Net Metering Case: As California regulators consider whether to approve their proposal to reduce the financial benefits of rooftop solar, analysts are saying that the effects of the plan would be much more damaging to the solar industry than regulators seem to be acknowledging. This week, the market research firm Wood Mackenzie issued a report that says the California plan will cut the state’s rooftop solar market in half by 2024 compared to what it would have been otherwise. The proposal would be devastating to rooftop solar businesses and discourage consumers from adding solar to their homes. Originally, the plan could have been voted on by the California Public Utilities Commission as soon as Jan. 27, but regulators confirmed that they have pulled the vote from their schedule and are not saying how long the delay may last, as Teri Sforza reports for Southern California News Group. One of the factors giving the panel pause is that Gov. Gavin Newsom, who appoints the panel’s members, has said he thinks changes need to be made to the plan. One option is for a member of the commission to propose an alternative, but that hasn’t happened yet.
General Motors Chooses Michigan for $7 Billion EV Investment: General Motors said this week that it will build a battery plant near Lansing, Michigan, and will expand production of electric trucks at its plant in Lake Orion, Michigan. The company said the $7 billion in spending is the largest in its history, as Paula Gardner reports for Bridge Michigan. GM was considering a variety of locations, but ended up choosing to remain close to its Detroit headquarters.
Biden Administration Aims to Update Efficiency Rules for Manufactured Housing: Responding to a court order, the Biden administration is proposing new efficiency standards for manufactured homes. The new rules would save consumers’ money on energy costs, but the proposal also has inspired some blowback from critics who warn of high costs, as Tik Root reports for The Washington Post.
California Utility Proposes A Huge Investment in Battery Storage: Pacific Gas & Electric said this week that it is proposing nine battery storage projects with a total capacity of 1,600 megawatts. The lithium-ion battery systems would provide up to four hours of storage. PG&E is making the proposal in response to a 2021 order from state regulators requiring utilities to procure 11,500 megawatts of new electricity resources to replace power plants that will soon be closing, including Diablo Canyon nuclear plant, as Kavya Balaraman reports for Utility Dive. For some perspective, the 1,600 megawatts from this one proposal is more than all the energy storage built in any single year in the United States prior to 2021.
Airstream Concept Vehicle Would Enable Off-Grid Living: Thor Industries, the recreational vehicle company that owns the storied Airstream brand of travel trailers, has said is it developing a prototype RV that would use a pair of electric motors that would help to ease the strain on the vehicle towing the trailer and be able to operate off the grid for up to two weeks. The Airstream eStream concept would help to extend the range of the towing vehicle, which would be especially valuable if that vehicle is an EV. The trailer would have a battery that can hold 80 kilowatt-hours of electricity, and rooftop solar panels to help power the batteries, as Greg Fink reports for Car and Driver.
Inside Clean Energy is ICN’s weekly bulletin of news and analysis about the energy transition. Send news tips and questions to firstname.lastname@example.org.