The Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank, has filed a lawsuit against New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to force disclosure of records connected to a coalition of state attorneys general who have vowed investigations of ExxonMobil and other fossil fuel companies.
CEI, a Washington D.C.-based nonprofit that has received funding from Exxon while leading efforts to sow doubt about climate change, wants to know if members of the Schneiderman-led coalition entered into an agreement to keep records connected to any investigations confidential. CEI and other allies of Exxon have been vigorously fighting these investigations since they were announced, and their suggestions that the attorneys general are secretly colluding have become a talking point across conservative media.
Schneiderman denied a request by CEI in May—made under New York’s Freedom of Information Law—for documents called common interest agreements that indicate a pact between coalition members not to publicly divulge information. His office claimed the records were exempt from disclosure.
“(Schneiderman) has not produced the records sought by (CEI) and has failed to properly invoke any legitimate exemptions under FOIL,” according to the lawsuit filed in the in the Albany County Supreme Court of New York.
The common interest agreement was revealed after a separate Freedom of Information Act request was filed by the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, an ally of CEI.
“None of the reasons Schneiderman claimed for withholding these documents are legitimate under New York law,” Sam Kazman, general counsel for CEI, said in a statement. “The public deserves to know what this AG, and the other AGs cooperating with him, agreed to when it came to targeting their political opponents, and that’s why we sought the Common Interest Agreement in the first place.”
Eric Soufer, a spokesman for Schneiderman, dismissed the lawsuit as a legal diversion.
“This is just the latest example of the industry turning to the Big Tobacco playbook: deny, delay, and distract from the real issues under investigation to avoid an honest conversation about the facts,” he said.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,