Exxon Won’t Sponsor AGU, a Win of Sorts for Oil Giant’s Opponents

Scientists had urged the science organization to reject funding because of Exxon’s climate denial history, but Exxon pulled out on its own.

Share This Article

The American Geophysical Union came under fire for accepting sponsorship money from Exxon
The American Geophysical Union has come under fire for accepting sponsorship money from Exxon for its annual conference, seen here. Credit: American Geophysical Union/flickr

Share This Article

Energy giant ExxonMobil won’t be a sponsor of the largest earth and space science conference for the first time since at least 2001.

It was Exxon’s decision not to provide any funding for the annual conference, which will be held next week in San Francisco, according to a blog post last week from the conference organizers, the American Geophysical Union.

This news follows a nearly year-long campaign, in which more than 60,000 scientists, activists and others urged AGU to not accept Exxon’s money because they say the company has contributed to the spread of misinformation about climate change. They argued that’s inconsistent with AGU’s mission, position statement on climate change and funding policies.

AGU’s board considered this issue twice this year, voting in April and again in September to keep Exxon as a sponsor.

Although those protesting Exxon’s sponsorship celebrated the absence of Exxon’s money, they also expressed disappointment that the decision didn’t come from AGU.

“We welcome news that Exxon won’t be funding the AGU conference this year, and encourage AGU to stand up for science by cutting financial ties with all fossil fuel companies,” wrote Brant Olson, director of ClimateTruth.org, in a statement. ClimateTruth.org is one of the science advocacy groups that’s pressed AGU on the issue.

Exxon provided $35,000 for a student breakfast at last year’s meeting. The company has sponsored this event for at least the last 15 years, and has funded travel grants for students to attend meetings in the past. Two AGU members who are current and former Exxon employees have also previously bundled donations on behalf of the energy company. In total, about $620,000 in donations from 2001-15 have been tied to Exxon. This amounts to 0.1 percent of AGU’s total revenue during that period.

Exxon did not respond to repeated requests by InsideClimate News about whether the scientists’ public campaign influenced its decision. AGU also declined to comment on Exxon’s motivation.

“It’s not AGU’s role to explain our sponsors’ decisions,” AGU spokeswoman Joan Buhrman wrote in an email.

Multiple state attorneys general are investigating whether Exxon failed to inform investors and the public about the risks posed to its business by climate change.

Peter Frumhoff, director of science and policy at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), told InsideClimate News that AGU’s sponsorship problems don’t end with Exxon. He pointed out that Chevron is one of this year’s conference sponsors. Both Chevron and ExxonMobil are failing to effectively confront climate change, according to a UCS study published this fall.

 

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Share This Article