Global oil demand, disrupted by the Iran war, is poised to shrink in 2026, the first time that’s happened since the COVID-19 pandemic, the International Energy Agency said on Friday.
What’s unclear is how the conflict will influence the long-term trajectory of oil demand, which is a vital concern as the world looks to reduce fossil fuel use to avoid the worst effects of climate change.
The IEA, in its monthly oil report, predicts global oil demand of 103.5 million barrels per day in 2026, which would be down 1 percent from the prior year.
But the decrease wouldn’t be a multi-year trend. Demand would grow in 2027, with 105.5 million barrels per day, an increase of 2 percent from 2026.
The Paris-based agency said the market is reacting to the changing security situation in the Strait of Hormuz, a major transit point for oil. Shipments in the strait dropped almost to zero in February under a military blockade and have been slow to resume as the conflict continues.
“Renewed exchanges of fire in the Gulf this week highlight the risks of not reaching a lasting peace agreement, which is a must for the normalization in oil markets,” the IEA said.
The war has contributed to gasoline price hikes in the United States. But the country is set to buck the global trend and increase its oil demand this year, the report said.
China, the world’s second-largest oil consumer after the United States, would see a reduction in demand.
But the changes for the world, United States and China are all small, to the point that they are barely visible when charted.
One of the larger questions for energy analysts is whether the Iran war will lead to a long-term reduction in oil demand relative to what it would have been without the war.
“I think the events of the past few months in Iran will have an effect and are likely to hasten the secular decrease in oil demand that we think is coming at some point,” said Samantha Gross, director of the Energy Security and Climate Initiative at the Brookings Institution, a think tank. “I think this disruption has been big enough, and, honestly, scary enough, that it is likely to change behavior both on policies and in the part of consumers.”
One way to frame the issue is to look at how the IEA discussed potential long-term peaks in oil demand in its World Energy Outlook in November. Under current policies, demand would continue rising through the end of the forecast period in 2050. The report also showed how the peak could happen much sooner with policy changes.
The next edition of the report this fall is likely to show how this outlook has changed.
While it’s unclear how much demand will recover, the war’s short-term effect is becoming clearer. The ramifications are substantial, for consumers paying more for fuel and for companies revising investment decisions, said Kenneth Medlock III, a fellow at the Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University.
“I’ve been calling it ‘The Year of the Shock,’” he said.
Just like there was a recovery after COVID, he expects oil demand to recover. But much will depend on the size of the recovery and whether the investments that did not happen in 2026 were delayed rather than canceled.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
Dan Gearino
Reporter, Clean Energy
Dan Gearino covers the business and policy of renewable energy and utilities, often with an emphasis on the midwestern United States. He is the main author of ICN’s Inside Clean Energy newsletter. He came to ICN in 2018 after a nine-year tenure at The Columbus Dispatch, where he covered the business of energy. Before that, he covered politics and business in Iowa and in New Hampshire. He grew up in Warren County, Iowa, just south of Des Moines, and lives in Columbus, Ohio.
